Volume 102, Page 705 View pdf image (33K) |
705
any State for that purpose subject to their ratification, ought to
Which was read the first time.
It was ordered to be noted upon the Journal, that Dr.
Mr. Negley moved to re-consider the vote by which the or-
Decided in the affirmative.
The further consideration of the subject was postponed On motion of Mr. Negley,
The Convention proceeded to the consideration of the
The question being on the amendment submitted by Mr. Mr. Thomas demanded the yeas and nays; The demand being sustained, The yeas and nays were called, and appeared as follows: AFFIRMATIVE. Messrs. Duvall, ' Mitchell, Berry, of Balt. co. Greene, Morgan, Bond, Hebb, Parran, Brown, Hoffman, Ridgely, Chambers, Hollyday, Schley, Crawford, Jones, of Som., Scott, Dail, Lansdale, Stirling,
Daniel, Lee, Turner—24.
89
|
||||
Volume 102, Page 705 View pdf image (33K) |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.