Volume 102, Page 648 View pdf image (33K) |
648 AFFIRMATIVE. Messrs. Clarke, Lansdale > Abbott, Dent, Lee, Audoun, Duvall, Marbury, Baker, Ecker, Markey, Barron, Greene, Miller, Belt, Hebb, Negley, Billingsley, Hollyday, Schlosser, Blackiston, Horsey, Sneary,
Brown, Keefer, Wickard—27. NEGATIVE. Messrs. Hopkins, Sands, Goldsborough, P't Hopper, Schley, Annan, Kennard, Scott, Carter, Larsh, Smith, of Carroll, Cunningham, Mayhugh, Smith, of Wor., Cushing, McComas, Stirling, Daniel, Mullikin, Stockbridge, Davis, of Wash., Parker, Swope, Dellinger, Pugh, Sykes, Farrow, Purnell, Thomas, Galloway, Ridgely, Todd, Hoffman, Russell, Wooden—35.
So the question upon its adoption was decided in the
Mr. Pugh moved to reconsider the vote by which the Decided in the affirmative.
The question recurring upon the adoption of said amend- It was determined in the affirmative.
The report was then ordered to be engrossed for a third
Mr. Ridgely moved to suspend the rules to place the report Decided in the negative. Mr. Brown moved that the Convention do now adjourn. Decided in the negative.
Mr. Purnell moved to suspend the rules to enable him to
|
||||
Volume 102, Page 648 View pdf image (33K) |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.