Volume 102, Page 632 View pdf image (33K) |
632
Briscoe, Hollyday, Smith, of Dor.,
So the question upon its adoption was decided in the af- On motion of Mr. Stockbridge,
The Convention proceeded to the consideration of bills upon
The report of the Committee on the Elective Franchise,
Mr. Briscoe moved to open the second section of the report
The question being upon the adoption of the motion,
The yeas and nays were called, and appeared as follows: Messrs. Chambers, Lee, Billingsley, Clarke, Miller, Blackiston, Dennis, Morgan, Bond, Dent, Parran, Briscoe, Hollyday, Smith of Dor., Brown, Horsey, Turner—17. NEGATIVE. Messrs. Hebb, Purnell, Goldsborough, P't Hoffman, Ridgely, Abbott, Hopkins, Russell, Annan, Hopper, Sands, Baker, Jones, of Cecil, Schley, Barron, Keefer, Scott, Brooks, Kennard, Smith, of Carroll, Carter, Larsh, Smith, of Wor., Cunningham, Markey, Stirling, Cushing, Mayhugh, Stockbridge, Daniel, McComas, Swope, Davis, of Wash., Mullikin, Sykes, Dellinger, Murray, Thomas, Earle, Negley, Todd, Ecker, Nyman, Valliant, Farrow, Parker, Wickard,
Galloway, Pugh, Wooden—51. |
||||
Volume 102, Page 632 View pdf image (33K) |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.