Volume 102, Page 605 View pdf image (33K) |
605
Franchise, and upon the refusal of the said party to take and
Mr. Ridgely moved to informally postpone the considera-
The question being on the adoption of the motion,
The yeas and nays were called, and appeared as follows: Messrs. King, Ridgely, Blackiston, Lansdale, Smith, of Dor. Crawford, Lee, Smith, of Wor. Duvall, Markey, Stockbridge, Hodson, Mitchell, Thomas, Hollyday, Morgan, Todd, Horsey, Parran, Wilmer—20. NEGATIVE. Messrs. Farrow, Purnell, Goldsborough, P't Galloway, Russell, Abbott, Greene, Sands, Annan, Hatch, Schley, Audoun, Hebb, Schlosser, Brooks, Hoffman, Scott, Carter, Hopper, Sneary, Cunningham, Mullikin, Stirling, Cushing, Murray, Swope, Daniel, Negley, Sykes, Davis, of Wash., Nyman, Wickard, Dellinger, Parker, Wooden—37. Ecker. Pugh,
So the question upon its adoption was decided in the nega-
The question recurring upon the adoption of the amend-
Mr. Audoun demanded the yeas and nays, |
||||
Volume 102, Page 605 View pdf image (33K) |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.