Volume 102, Page 594 View pdf image (33K) |
594
The yeas and nays were called, and appeared as follows: Messrs. Greene. Ridgely, Abbott, Hebb, Russell, Annan, Hoffman, Schley, Belt, Hopkins, Schlosser, Bond, Keefer, Smith, of Carroll, Brooks, Kennard, Smith, of Wor., Cunningham, King, Sneary, Cushing, Murray, Swope, Davis, of Wash. Negley, Sykes, Ecker, Nyman, Wickard,
Farrow, Pugh, Wooden-—33. NEGATIVE. Messrs. Hollyday, Parker, Goldsborough, Pt. Hopper, Parran, Audoun, Horsey, Peter, Billingsley, Lansdale, Purnell, Blackiston, Larsh, Smith, of Dor., Briscoe, Lee, Stirling, Crawford, Markey, Stockbridge, Daniel, McComas, Thomas', Dellinger, Mitchell, Todd, Dent^ Miller, Turner, Duvall, Morgan, Valliant,
Edelen, Mullikin, Wilmer—36. So the call for the previous question was not sustained;
Mr. McComas, (seconded by Messrs. Miller and Purnell,
The question being on the adoption of the motion;
The yeas and nays were called, and appeared as follows: Messrs. Hollyday, Parran, Abbott, Hopkins, Peter, Annan, Hopper, Pugh, Bond, Horsey, Ridgely,
Briscoe, Keefer, Russell,
|
||||
Volume 102, Page 594 View pdf image (33K) |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.