Volume 102, Page 571 View pdf image (33K) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
571
So the question upon its adoption was decided in the af-
The question recurring upon the adoption of the second Mr. Thomas demanded the yeas and nays; The demand being sustained, The yeas and nays were called, and appeared as follows: AFFIRMATIVE. Messrs. Galloway, Murray, Abbott, Hatch, Negley, Audoun. Hodson, Pugh, Billingsley, Hollyday, Purnell, Briscoe, Hopper, Russell, Brown, Johnson, Sneary, Chambers, Jones, of Cecil, Turner, Daniel, Mayhugh, Valliant, Ecker, McComas, Wickard—27. Gale, Miller, NEGATIVE. Messrs. Hoffman, Ridgely, Goldsborough, P't Hopkins, Robinette, Annan, Horsey, Schley, Belt, Keefer, Smith, of Carroll, Berry, of P. Geo., Kennard, Smith, of Wor., Blackiston, Larsh, Stirling, Bond, Lee, Stockbridge, Carter, Mitchell, Swope, Cunningham, Morgan, Sykes, Dent, Mullikin, Thomas, Duvall, Nyman, Thruston, Farrow, Parker, Wooden—37. Hebb, Parran,
So the question upon its adoption was decided in the
Mr. Thomas submitted the following amendment to the
Strike out the words "or until he shall have attained the
Decided in the negative.
|
![]() | |||
![]() | ||||
![]() |
Volume 102, Page 571 View pdf image (33K) |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.