Volume 102, Page 545 View pdf image (33K) |
545
The question being on the adoption of the amendment sub-
Mr. Mayhugh demanded the yeas and nays,
The yeas and nays were called, and appeared as follows: Messrs. Duvall, Nyman, Goldsborough, P't Earle, Parker, Audoun, Galloway, Ridgely, Blackiston, Hopkins, Russell, Bond, Kennard, Smith, of Carroll, Briscoe, Lansdale, Sneary, Brooks, Larsh, Stirling, Carter, McComas, Stockbridge, Chambers, Miller, Sykes,
Clarke, Negley, Wooden—30. NEGATIVE. Messrs. Gale, Mullikin, Abbott, Hatch, Murray, Annan, Hebb, Parran, Billingsley, Hopper, Purnell, Brown, Horsey, Robinette, Crawford, Keefer, Schlosser, Cunningham, King Smith, of Dor., Daniel, Lee, Swope, Davis, of Charles, Markey, Todd, Ecker, Mayhugh, Wickard—31. Edelen, Mitchell,
So the question upon its adoption was decided in the nega-
The question recurring upon the adoption of the amend-
Mr. Wickard demanded the yeas and nays;
The yeas and nays were called, and appeared as follows: Messrs. Hopper, Parker, Goldsborough, Pt. Horsey, Parran, Annan, Jones, of Som., Ridgely,
69
|
||||
Volume 102, Page 545 View pdf image (33K) |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.