Volume 102, Page 534 View pdf image (33K) |
534
Mr. Berry, of Prince George's, demanded the yeas and The demand being sustained. The yeas and nays were called, and appeared as follows: AFFIRMATIVE. Messrs. Keefer, Robinette, Annan, Kennard, Russell, Carter, King, Sands, Cunningham, Markey, Schley, Cushing, Mayhugh, Schlosser, Daniel, McComas, Smith, of Wor., Davis, of Wash., Mullikin, Stirling, Ecker, Murray, Stockbridge, Galloway, Negley, Swope, Hebb, Nyman, Sykes, Hopkins, Pugh, Todd—34. Hopper, Purnell, NEGATIVE. Messrs. Crawford, Lansdale, Goldsborough, P't Dent, Lee, Abbott, Duvall, Marbury, Audoun, Earle, Mitchell, Berry, of P. Geo. Edelen, Miller, Billingsley, Gale, Morgan, Blackiston, Hodson, Parran, Brown, Horsey, Smith, of Carroll,
Chambers, Jones, of Som., Turner—27.
So the question upon its adoption was decided in the
The question then recurring upon the adoption of the On motion of Mr. Smith, of Carroll,
The further consideration of section 12, was informally
Mr. Berry, of Prince George's gave notice that when the
Strike out the words in the amendment "for the period of |
||||
Volume 102, Page 534 View pdf image (33K) |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.