Volume 102, Page 497 View pdf image (33K) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
49?
have scarcely men enough left to protect and support the
Resolved, That the members of this Convention deem it a Which was read the first time. Mr. Ecker submitted the following order:
Ordered, That it be entered upon the Journal that the The question being on the adoption of the order, Mr. Ecker demanded the yeas and nays; The demand being sustained, The yeas and nays were called, and appeared as follows: AFFIRMATIVE. Messrs. Ecker, Pugh, Goldsborough, P't Galloway, Purnell, Abbott, Hoffman, Russell, Annan, Hopkins, Sands, Brown, Hopper, Scott, Carter, Keefer, Smith, of Carroll, Cunningham, King, Smith, of Wor., Cushing, McComas, Stirling, Daniel, Mullikin, Swope, Davis, of Wash., Murray, Thruston, Dennis, Negley, Todd, Earle, Parker, Wooden—35. NEGATIVE. Messrs. Hatch, Morgan, Audoun, Hodson, Parran, Belt, Jones, of Som., Peter,
63
|
![]() | |||
![]() | ||||
![]() |
Volume 102, Page 497 View pdf image (33K) |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.