Volume 102, Page 492 View pdf image (33K) |
492 NEGATIVE. Messrs. Ecker, Purnell, Goldsborough, P't Edelen, Robinette, Annan, Galloway, Russell, Audoun, Hopkins, Sands, Berry, of P. Geo., Hopper, Schlosser, Billingsley, Jones, of Som., Scott, Brooks, Keefer, Smith, of Carroll, Brown, Kennard, Smith, of Dor., Carter, Lee, Smith, of Wor., Clarke, Mayhugh, Stirling, Crawford, McComas, Stockbridge, Cunningham, Mitchell, Swope, Cushing, Miller, Thomas, Daniel, Mullikin, Thruston, Davis, of Charles, Murray, Todd, Davis, of Wash., Nyman, Valliant, Dellinger, Parker, Wickard—51. Earle, Pugh.
So the question upon its adoption was decided in the nega-
Mr. Smith, of Carroll, submitted the following amend- Strike out section 6; The question being on the adoption of the amendment, Mr. Stirling demanded the yeas and nays, The demand being sustained, The yeas and nays were called, and appeared as follows: AFFIRMATIVE. Messrs. Davis, of Charles, Mitchell, Berry, of P. Geo., Ecker, Miller, Billingsley, Edelen, Robinette, Bond, Hodson, Smith, of Carroll, Brown, Jones, of Som. Smith, of Dor. Clarke, King, Swope, Crawford, Lee, Thomas—20. NEGATIVE. Messrs. Galloway, Purnell, Goldsborough, P't Hopkins, Russell, Abbott, Hopper, Sands,
Annan, Keefer, Schlosser,
|
||||
Volume 102, Page 492 View pdf image (33K) |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.