Volume 102, Page 478 View pdf image (33K) |
4T8
So the question upon its adoption was decided in the
Mr. Stockbridge moved that the Convention proceed to the Decided in the negative. On motion of Mr. Stockbridge,
The Convention proceeded to the consideration of the Mr. Sands submitted the following amendment:
Sec. 2, strike out the words, in the second and third 'lines, Decided in the negative. Mr. Miller submitted the following amendment:
Strike out the section, and insert the section contained in The question being on the adoption of the amendment;
Mr. Berry, of Prince George's, demanded the yeas and The demand being sustained, The yeas and nays were called, and appeared as follows: AFFIRMATIVE. Messrs. Harwood, Ridgely, Berry, of P. Geo. Hollyday, Smith, of Dor. Billingsley, Jones, of Som'., Thomas, Bond, Lee, Turner, Davis, of Charles, Mitchell, Valliant, Dennis, Miller, Wilmer—19. Edelen, Morgan, NEGATIVE. Messrs. Hoffman, Purnell, Goldsborough, P't Hopkins, Robinette, Abbott, Hopper, Russell, Annan, Jones, of Cecil, Sands, Brooks, Keefer, Scott, Carter, Kennard, Smith, of Wor.,
Cunningham, King, Sneary,
|
||||
Volume 102, Page 478 View pdf image (33K) |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.