Volume 102, Page 467 View pdf image (33K) |
467 Davis, of Wash., Mayhugh, Sykes, Dellinger, McComas, Thomas, Earle, Mullikin, Thruston, Ecker, Murray, Todd, Farrow, Nyman, Valliant, Galloway, Parker, Wickard, Greene, Pugh, Wooden—47.
So the question upon its adoption was decided in the
The question then being on the adoption of the amend-
Mr. Berry, of Prince George's, demanded the yeas and The demand being sustained, The yeas and nays were called, and appeared as follows: AFFIRMATIVE. Messrs. Hatch, Robinette, Goldsborough, P't Hebb, Russell, Abbott, Hoffman, Scott, Annan, Hopkins, Smith, of Carroll, Audoun, Hopper, Smith, of Wor., Brooks, Keefer, Sneary, Cunningham, Kennard, Stirling, Cushing, Markey, Stockbridge, Daniel, Mayhugh, Swope, Davis, of Wash., McComas, Sykes, Dellinger, Mullikin, Thomas, Earle, Murray, Thruston, Ecker, Nyman, Todd, Farrow, Parker, Valliant, Galloway, Pugh, Wickard, Greene, Purnell, Wooden—i7. NEGATIVE.
Messrs. Edelen, Mitchell,
So the question upon its adoption was decided in the
Mr. Stockbridge submitted the following amendment:
|
||||
Volume 102, Page 467 View pdf image (33K) |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.