Volume 102, Page 459 View pdf image (33K) |
459 The demand being sustained,
The yeas and nays were called, and appeared as follows:
Messrs. Dail, Lee, NEGATIVE. Messrs. Hopper, Robinette, Abbott, Jones, of Cecil, Russell, Annan, Keefer, Schley, Audoun, Kennard, Scott, Baker, King, Smith, of Carroll, Cunningham, Larsh, Smith, of Wor., Cushing, Markey, Stirling, Daniel, Mayhugh, Stockbridge, Dellinger, McComas, Swope, Earle, Mullikin, Sykes, Ecker, Murray, Thomas, Farrow, Nyman, Todd, Greene, Parker, Valliant, Hebb, Pugh, Wickard, Hoffman, Purnell, Wooden—46. Hopkins, Ridgely,
So the question upon its adoption was decided in the
On motion of Mr. Berry, of Prince George's, |
||||
Volume 102, Page 459 View pdf image (33K) |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.