Volume 102, Page 401 View pdf image (33K) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
401
The question next being the on the amendment of Mr. Mr. Miller, demanded the yeas and nays, The demand being sustained, The yeas and nays were called, and appeared as follows: AFFIRMATIVE. Messrs. Duvall, Miller, Stockbridge—3. NEGATIVE. Messrs. Greene, Murray, Goldsborough, P't Harwood, Negley, Abbott, Hatch, Nyman, Annan, Hebb, Parker, Audoun, Hoffman, Parran, Baker, Hollyday, Pugh, Belt, Hopkins, Purnell, Blackiston, Hopper, Ridgely, Bond, Horsey, Robinette, Brown, Johnson, Russell, Carter, Jones, of Cecil, Schley, Chambers, Keefer, Scott, Clarke, Kennard, Smith, of Carroll, Cunningham, King, Smith, of Wor., Daniel, Lansdale, Sneary, Davis, of Wash., Larsh, Stirling, Dellinger, Lee, Todd, Earle, Mace, Turner, Ecker, Marbury, Valliant, Farrow, Mayhugh, Wickard, Gale, McComas, Wilmer, Galloway, Morgan, Wooden—65.
So the question upon its adoption was decided in the nega-
The question then being on the adoption of the amend- Mr. Hebb demanded the yeas and nays, The demand being sustained, The yeas and nays were called, and appeared as follows: AFFIRMATIVE
Messrs. Greene, Purnell,
51
|
![]() | |||
![]() | ||||
![]() |
Volume 102, Page 401 View pdf image (33K) |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.