|
|
|
327
and the resolution offered on July 20th, and in favor of the
resolution offered by Mr. Belt on July 21st.
On motion of Mr. Clarke,
It was ordered that it be entered on the Journal, that if
Mr, Clarke, of Prince George's county, had been present
when the votes were taken upon the order offered by Mr.
Schley, on Tuesday, July 19th, 1864, upon the order sub-
mitted by Mr. Sands on Wednesday, July 20th, 1864, and
upon the resolutions offered by Mr. Stirling on Wednesday,
July 20th, 1864, be would have voted in the negative.
On motion of Mr. Ridgely,
It was ordered that it be entered upon the Journal, upon
the request of Mr. Mace, of Baltimore county, (absent from
indisposition, ) that the vote cast by him against the propo-
sition of Mr. Schley, of Frederick, requesting the President
of the United States and the military authorities in Maryland
to assess upon the known rebels of the State the losses sus-
tained by the loyal men of the State by the recent rebel raid,
was so cast in entire misconception of the true state of the
facts, and that upon more mature reflection and better infor-
mation, he is convinced that the proposition was just and
proper, and ought to have been adopted.
On motion of Mr. Barron,
It was ordered that it be entered on the Journal, that if
John Barron had been present on Monday, July 25th, he
would have voted for section 40 of the Legislative Depart-
ment, as reported by the Committee.
On motion of Mr. Marbury,
It was ordered that it be entered on the Journal, that had
Mr. Marbury, of Prince George's county, been present when
the resolution of Mr. Cushing, of July 9th, the reprisal reso-
lution of Mr. Schley, of July 19th, and the banishment re-
solution of Mr. Stirling, of July 20th, 1864, were presented,
he would have voted in the negative.
On motion of Mr. Ridgely,
It was ordered that it be entered upon the Journal, that if
Mr. Ridgely, of Baltimore county, had been present when
the vote was taken upon the resolutions offered by Mr. Stir-
ling, of Baltimore city, on Thursday, the 21st inst., relating
to disloyalists, he would have voted for the resolutions.
The Report of the Committee on the Legislative Depart-
ment,
|
|
|
|
 |
