|
|
|
273
So the question upon its adoption was decided in the
affirmative.
Mr. Barron moved a suspension of the rules, in order to
take up the resolutions submitted by Mr. Stirling, on yester-
day, in reference to the removal beyond the lines of the army
of sympathisers with the rebellion;
The question being on the adoption of the motion,
Mr. Jones, of Somerset, demanded the yeas and nays.
The demand being sustained,
The yeas and nays were called, and appeared as follows:
AFFIRMATIVE.
Messrs. Greene, Negley,
Goldsborough, P't Hatch, Nyman,
Abbott, Hoffman, Pugh,
Annan, Hopkins, Russell,
Barron, Hopper, Sands,
Brooks, Keefer, Schley,
Carter, Kennard, Smith, of Carroll,
Cunningham, King, Sneary,
Cushing, Larsh, Stirling,
Daniel, Mace, Stockbridge,
Davis, of Wash., Markey, Swope,
Earle, McComas, Wickard,
Ecker, Mullikin, Wooden—40.
Galloway, Murray,
NEGATIVE.
Messrs. Harwood, Mitchell,
Belt, Henkle, Miller,
Crawford, Hollyday, Morgan,
Dail, Johnson, Parker,
Davis, of Charles, Jones, of Som. Smith, of Dor, -1 fi.
Dent, Lee,
So the question upon its adoption was decided in the
affirmative.
The resolutions were then read the second time.
Mr. Belt submitted the following amendment:
Add to the end of the first resolution the words:
Provided, however, that nothing contained herein shall be
taken to endorse any other theory of the existing war than
that expressed in the resolution of Congress of July 1861,
35
|
|
|
|
 |
