|
|
|
235
So the question upon its adoption was decided in the
negative.
The report was then ordered to be engrossed for a third
reading.
Mr. Stirling moved to suspend the rules, in order to give
the report a third reading.
Decided in the affirmative, by yeas and nays as follows:
AFFIRMATIVE.
Messrs. Abbott, Hopper, Russell,
Annan, Jones, of Cecil, Sands,
Baker, Keefer, Schley,
Carter, Larsh, Schlosser,
Cunningham, McComas, Scott,
Cushing, Mullikin, Smith, of Carroll,
Daniel, Murray, Sneary,
Davis, of Wash., Noble, Stirling,
Earle, Nyman, Swope,
Ecker, Parker, Sykes,
Galloway, Pugh, Todd,
Hatch, Purnell, Wickard
Hebb, ' Ridgely, Wooden—40.
Hopkins,
NEGATIVE.
Messrs. Brown, Lansdale,
Goldsborough, P't Chambers, Miller,
Audoun, Clarke, Morgan,
Belt, Dent, Peter,
Bond, Edelen, Stockbridge,
Briscoe, Hollyday, Thomas—18.
Brooks,
The report being on its third reading,
Mr. Briscoe submitted the following order:
Ordered, That the Bill of Rights as amended on its second
reading, be printed and made the order of the day for Mon-
day, at 1 o'clock, P. M.
Mr. Daniel submitted the following amendment:
Amend by adding "and that the final vote thereon shall
be taken precisely at 2 o'clock, P. M. "
Decided in the negative.
|
|
|
|
 |
