clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings and Debates of the 1864 Constitutional Convention
Volume 102, Page 209   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space
209
Markey, Mayhugh, Mullikin, Negley, Noble, Peter, Ridgely,
Schley, Schlosser, Smith, of Carroll, Swope, Thruston, Todd,
Turner, Wilmer—27.
The proceedings of Friday were read and approved.
Mr. Hatch submitted the following order:
Ordered, That the Committee on the Judiciary be instruct-
ed to inquire into the expediency of inserting in the Consti-
tution an article providing "that no officer of the Federal or
State Government shall be held responsible for any act done
by him under the authority of the Federal Government, pro-
vided said act is in conformity with such authority; "
Which was rejected.
On motion of Mr. Clarke, (seconded by Messrs. Chambers
and Miller, )
The vote last taken was reconsidered.
The question recurring upon the adoption of the order,
It was decided in the affirmative.
Mr. Hollyday, from a minority of the Committee on the
Legislative Department, submitted the following
REPORT:
The Undersigned, the minority of the Committee on the
Legislative Department, respectfully beg leave to Report,
that they dissent from the Report of the Majority of said
Committee made to the Convention, in the following parti-
culars, viz:
First—The undersigned recommend, instead of the 40th
section of the Majority Report, the adoption of the following
section, viz: —The General Assembly shall have power to
pass such laws, and make such appropriations, as may be
necessary to compensate owners of such slaves as shall be
emancipated from servitude by the adoption of this Constitu-
tion.
The undersigned also differ with the majority, as to the
propriety of adopting the 46th and 47th sections as reported,
and they recommend that those sections be rejected.
Respectfully submitted,
GEO. J. HOLLYDAY,
W. H. GALE,
JOHN TURNER.
Which was read.
27


 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings and Debates of the 1864 Constitutional Convention
Volume 102, Page 209   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  Cannot perform flastmod(): Win32 Error Code = 2

Maryland State Archives