|
|
|
11T.
The question being on the adoption of the motion,
Mr. Clarke demanded the yeas and nays.
The demand being sustained,
The yeas and nays were called and appeared as follows:
AFFIRMATIVE.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Messrs.
|
Galloway,
|
Nyman,
|
|
|
|
Goldsborough, P't
|
Greene,
|
Pugh,
|
|
|
|
Abbott,
|
Hebb,
|
Robinette,
|
|
|
|
Annan,
|
Hoffman,
|
Russell,
|
|
|
|
Audoun,
|
Hopkins,
|
Sands,
|
|
|
|
Baker,
|
Hopper,
|
Scott,
|
|
|
|
Berry, of Balt. co.
|
Jones, of Cecil,
|
Smith, of Carroll,
|
|
|
|
Brooks,
|
Keefer,
|
Sneary,
|
|
|
|
Carter,
|
Kennard,
|
Stirling,
|
|
|
|
Cunningham,
|
King,
|
Sykes,
|
|
|
|
Cushing,
|
Larsh,
|
Thomas,
|
|
|
|
Daniel,
|
Markey,
|
Thruston,
|
|
|
|
Davis, of Wash.,
|
McComas,
|
Todd,
|
|
|
|
Dellinger,
|
Mullikin,
|
Valliant,
|
|
|
|
Earle,
|
Murray,
|
Wickard,
|
|
|
|
Ecker,
|
Negley,
|
Wooden — 49.
|
|
|
|
Farrow,
|
Noble,
|
|
|
|
|
|
NEGATIVE.
|
|
|
|
|
Messrs. Barren,
|
Davis, of Charles,
|
Lee,
|
|
|
|
Berry, of P. G.,
|
Duvall,
|
Marbury,
|
|
|
|
Billingsley,
|
Edelen,
|
Mitchell,
|
|
|
|
Blackiston,
|
Harwood,
|
Miller,
|
|
|
|
Bond,
|
Henkle,
|
Morgan,
|
|
|
|
Briscoe,
|
Hodson,
|
Parker,
|
|
|
|
Brown,
|
Horsey,
|
Parran,
|
|
|
|
Chambers,
|
Johnson,
|
Peter,
|
|
|
|
Clarke,
|
Jones, of Sora.
|
Smith, of Dor.,
|
|
|
|
Crawford,
|
Lansdale,
|
Wilmer — 30.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So the question upon its adoption was decided in the affir-
mative.
The question then recurring upon the second amendment
submitted by Mr. Cushing,
Mr. Berry, of Prince George's, demanded the yeas and
nays.
The demand being sustained,
The yeas and nays were called and appeared as follows:
|
|
|
|
 |
