|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cushing,
|
Markey,
|
Swope,
|
|
|
|
Dail,
|
McComas,
|
Sykes,
|
|
|
|
Daniel,
|
Mitchell,
|
Thomas,
|
|
|
|
Davis, of Charles,
|
Miller,
|
Thurston,
|
|
|
|
Davis, of Wash.,
|
Morgan,
|
Todd,
|
|
|
|
Dellinger,
|
Mullikin,
|
Valliant,
|
|
|
|
Earle,
|
Murray,
|
Wickard,
|
|
|
|
Ecker,
|
Negley,
|
Wilmer,
|
|
|
|
Edelen,
|
Noble;
|
Wooden— 84.
|
|
|
|
Farrow,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So the amendment was rejected.
The question then recurring on the adoption of the 2d arti-
cle, on its second reading,
It was decided in the affirmative.
Mr. Marbury submitted the following amendment:
Amend the 3d article by adding to the end thereof the fol-
lowing words: "and all other property which they have ac>A
quired and hold under the Constitution and laws of this State,
and the Constitution and laws of the United States, as well in
times of war as in times of peace. "
The question being on the adoption of said amendment,
Mr. Jones, of Somerset, demanded a division of the matter.
The question being on the adoption of the first clause of
said amendment, to wit: "and all other property which they
have acquired and hold under the Constitution and laws of
this State, and the Constitution and laws of the United
States. "
Mr. Clarke demanded the yeas and nays.
The demand being sustained, the yeas and nays were called
and appeared as follows:
AFFIRMATIVE.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Messrs. Belt,
|
Dail,
|
Lee,
|
|
|
|
Berry, of P. Geo.,
|
Davis, of Charles,
|
Marbury,
|
|
|
|
Billingsley,
|
Edelen,
|
Mitchell,
|
|
|
|
Blackiston,
|
Harwood,
|
Miller,
|
|
|
|
Bond,
|
Henkle,
|
Morgan,
|
|
|
|
Briscoe,
|
Hollyday,
|
Parran,
|
|
|
|
Brown,
|
Horsey,
|
Peter,
|
|
|
|
Clarke,
|
Johnson,
|
Smith, of Dor.,
|
|
|
|
Crawford,
|
Jones, of Sora.,
|
Wilmer— 27.
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
