clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings and Debates of the 1850 Constitutional Convention
Volume 101, Volume 2, Debates 722   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space
722 first session after the adoption of this Constitu-
tion, to pass a bill for taking the sense of the
qualified voters of this State at the next ensuing
general election of delegates, touching the basis
of representation in the House of Delegates, and
providing that at such election the voters shall
vote for or against "population as the basis;"
and if a majority of the votes as then cast shall
be for population as the basis, the legislature at judgment of the Convention?" It was
Decided in the affirmative.
So the amendment was ruled out of order.
The question then recurred on seconding the
demand for the previous question.
On notion of Mr. MORGAN,
The Convention was called.
On motion of Mr. SHERWOOD, of Baltimore
city,
Further proceedings under the call were dis-
pensed with.
The question then recurred on the motion of
Mr. HOWARD, for the previous question,
Mr. BOWIE moved the question be taken by
yeas and nays;
Which motion was not sustained.
The previous question was then seconded.
The question was then stated to be on the
amendment offered by Mr. JOHNSON to the propo-
sition of Mr. CHAMBERS.
Mr. CHAMBERS. Have I the privilege of ac-
cepting the amendment as a part of my proposi-
tion?
The PRESIDENT. The Chair thinks not, unless
it is done by unanimous consent.
Objection was made.
Mr. CHAMBERS. The gentleman from Fred-
erick and myself had a distinct understanding,
that we should take the vote on the several pro-
positions, seriatim, first on the districting of the
city of Baltimore, second on the mode of district-
ing as proposed in my proposition, and then on
the proposition to district the counties.
Mr. THOMAS. I only spoke as an individual;
I cannot prescribe a rule for the House. I with-
drew my amendment with that understanding.
The question was again stated to be on agree-
ing to the amendment of Mr. JOHNSON.
Mr. STEWART, of Baltimore city, demanded
the yeas and nays, which were ordered, and be-
ing taken, were as follows:
Affirmative—Messrs. Chapman, Pres't., Dent,
Hopewell, Ricaud, Lee, Chambers of Kent
Mitchell, Donaldson, Dorsey, Wells, Randall,


 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings and Debates of the 1850 Constitutional Convention
Volume 101, Volume 2, Debates 722   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives