clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings and Debates of the 1850 Constitutional Convention
Volume 101, Page 764   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 
 
p764

Randall, Weems, Dairymple, Brent of Charles, John De.nni~
Dashiell, Williams, Hicks, Hodson, Goldsborough, I3owie, Tuck,
Sprigg, McCubbin, Bowling, I)irickson, McMaster, Hearn, Fooks,
Jacobs, Schley, Kilgour, Waters and Smith—32.
So the order was adopted.
Mr. Morgan, submitted the following order, and moved the
revious question.
Ordered, That George S. King, be allowed one dollar per diem
as compensation for extra services rendered as acting assistant
Secretary of this Convention.

Mr. Thawley, moved to lay said order on the table.
Mr. Thawle3 , moved the question be taken by yeas and nays
and being ordered appeared as follows:
AFFIRMATIVE —Messrs. Lee, Sellman, Howard, Lloyd, Shei-
wood of Talbot, Coiston, Dashiell, McCullough, Spencer,
Wright, Fooks, Jacobs, Sliriver, Biser, Annari, Sappington,
Stephenson, Nelson, Carter, Thawley, Ware, Schley, John New-
corner, ilarbine, Michael Newcomer, Brewer, Waters, Weber,
SmiTh, Parke anti Brown—31.
NEGATIVE—Messrs. Chapman, Pres't, Morgan, Blackistone,
Dent, Hopewel, Ricaud, Donaldson, Dorsey, Wells, Weews,
IJalrymple, Buchanan, Bell, Welch, John Dennis, Williams,
Hicks, Hodson, Goldsborough, Eccieston, Phelps, Constable,
Miller, McLane, Bowie, Tuck, Sprigg, Bowlinn, George, Hearn,
~aither, McHenry, Gwinn, Stewart. of Balt. city, Brent, of Balt.
city, Fiery, Neill, Kilgour, Anderson and Fitzpatrick—40.
So the convention refused to lay the order on the table.
The question then recurred on the motion for the previous
question and being seconded;
The question was put, on the adoption of said order.
Mr. Stephenson, moved the question be taken by yeas and
nays and being ordered, appeared as follows:
APFIRMATIwE—Messrs. Chapman, Pres't, Morgan, Blakistone,
Dent, Hopewell, Ricaud, Donaldson, Dorsey, Wells, Weerns,
Dairymple, Howard, Buchanan, Welch, Chandler, Ridgelv,
John Dennis, Williams, Hicks, Hodson, Goldsborough, Eccles.
ton, Constable, McLane, Bowie, r[~ck, Sprigg, Bowling, George,
McHenry, Stewart of Balt. city, Brent of Balt. city, Neill, Kilgour,
Waters, Anderson and Fitzpatrick—37.

NEGATIVE—-Messrs. Lee, Kent, Bell, Lloyd, Colston, Da-
~hie1l, Spencer, Hearn, Fooks, Jacobs, Sliriver, Gaither, Biser,
Annan, Sappiugton, Stephenson, Nelson, Garter, Thawley,
Schley, Fiery, John Newcomer, Harbine, Michael Newcomer,
Brewer, Paike, Cockey and Brown—28.
~o the order was adopted.


 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings and Debates of the 1850 Constitutional Convention
Volume 101, Page 764   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives