clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings and Debates of the 1850 Constitutional Convention
Volume 101, Page 726   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 
 
 
ture for the purpose of electing delegates therein; each county in
the State entitled to more than two delegates, and the city of Bal-
timore shall be divided into seprrate election districts, of compact
contiguous territory or ward in the manner following: The city
of Baltimore shall be divided into five districts of compact con-
tiguous territory each of which shall be entitled to two delegates,
and each of the counties having more than two delegates, shall
he divided into districts of compact, contiguous territory as follows:
every county now being entitled to three delegates shall he divided
into two districts, one of which shall be entitLed to two
delegates and the other one delegate; and each county
having four delegates shall he divided into two districts, each of
which shall be entitled to two delegates; and every county having
five delegates shall be divided into three eistricts, two of which
shall be entitled to two delegates, and one district to one delegate;
and every county having six delegates shall be divided into three
districts, each of which shall elect two delegates.''
Which was read.

Mr. Chandler, moved the convention adjourn;
Determined in the negative.

Mr. Dent, moved the previous question, and being seconded;

The question was put on the amendment as offered by Mr.
Johnson.

Mr. Bowie moved for a division of the question upon said
amendment.
Mr. Ricaud, being in the Chair, decided the amendment was
not divisable.

The question was then put on the amendment as offered by
Mr Johnson.

Mr. Johnson, moved the question be taken by yeas and nays
and being ordered appeared as follows
AFFIRMATIVE —Messrs. Chapman, Pres't, Morgan, Blakistone,
Dent, Hopewell, Lee, Donaldson , Dorsey, Wells, Randall, Weems,
Dalrymple, Brent, of Charles, Merrick, Jenifer, Bowling, Fooks,
Johnson, Gaither, Annan, Fiery, Neill, John Newcomer, Davis,
Kilgour, Waters and Smith---27.

NEGATIVE—Messrs. Ricaud, Chambers, of Kent, Kent, Sell-
man, Howard, Buchanan, Bell, Welch, Chandler, Ridgely,
Lloyd, Sherwood of Talbof, Colston, John Dennis, Williams,
Hicks, Goldsborough, Eccleston, Phelps, Constable, Cham-
bers, of Cecil, Miller, McLane, Bowie, Tuck, Sprigg, McCubbin,
Spencer, Grason, George, Wright, Diricks3n, McMaster, Hearn,
Jacobs, Thomas, Sh river, Biser, Sappington, Stephenson, Mc-
Henry, Magraw, Nelson, Carter, Thawley, Stewart, of Caroline,
Hardcastle, Gwinn, Stewart of Balt. city, Brent, of Balt. city,
Sherwood, of Balt, city, Presstman, Ware, Schley, Harbine,


 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings and Debates of the 1850 Constitutional Convention
Volume 101, Page 726   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives