clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings and Debates of the 1850 Constitutional Convention
Volume 101, Page 706   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

706

So the Convention refused to reconsider the vote on said amend
ment.

Mr. Dent gave notice that on to-morrow he should move to
reconsider the vote of the Convention on the substitute ofléred by
Mr. Thomas and to be found on page 705 of journal.

Mr. Chambers, of Kent, gave notice that on to-morrow he
should move to reconsider the vote of the Convention just taken
on the motion to reconsider the amendment offered by him.

Mr. Ege moved the convention suspend the rule and take up
for consideration the motion submitted by Mr. Dent, to reconsider
the vote of the convention on the substitute offered by Mr.
Thomas.

Mr. Tuck moved the question be taken by yeas and nays and
being ordered appeared as follows:

AFFIRMATIVE—Messrs. Chapman, Pres't, Blakistone, Dent,
Ricaud, Sellman, Weems, Bond, Sollers, Howard, Buchanan, Bell,
Welch, Ridgely, Lloyd, Constable, McCullough, Miller, McLane,
Bowie, Spencer, Grason, George, Wright, Thomas, Shriver, Gaither,
Biser, Annan, Sappington, Stephenson, McHenry, Magraw, Nelson,
Carter, Thawley, Stewart of Caroline, Hardcastle, Gwinn, Stewart
of Balt. city, Brent of Balt. city. Sherwood, of Balt city, Press
man, Ware, Schley, Neill, John Newcomer, Harbine, Michael
Newcomer, Brewer, Anderson, Weber, Hollyday, Slicer, Fitzpat
rick, Smith, Parke, Ege, Shower, Cockey and Brown—60.

NEGATIVE—Messrs. Morgan, Hopewell, Lee, Chambers of Kent,
Donaldson, Dorsey, Wells, Randall, Kent, Dalrymple, Brent, of
Charles, Sherwood, of Talbot, Colston, John Dennis, Dashiell,
Williams, Hicks, Hodson, Goldsborough, Eceleston, Phelps, Tuck,
Sprigg, McCubbin, Bowling, Dirickson, McMaster, Hearn, Fooks,
Jacobs, Fiery, Davis, Kilgour and Waters—34.
So the Convention refused to suspend the rule.

The Convention then resumed the consideration of the un
finished order of the day, being the report of the committee on
the Judiciary;

Mr. Davis, moved to postpoue the consideration of the order of
the day, and take up for consideration the report of the commit
tee on Education

Determined in the negative.

Mr. Davis, moved for- the yeas and nays;

Which motion was not sustained.

Mr. McHenry, from commiitee No. 7, submitted the following
REPORT:
Sec. 1st. On the first Wednesday of November eighteen hun
dred and fifty one and the same day every second year thereafter,
the qualified voter-s of each county shall, by general ticket, elect
from amongst themselves, the same number of persons, to consti
tute the board of commissioners for such county as it may then be


 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings and Debates of the 1850 Constitutional Convention
Volume 101, Page 706   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives