clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings and Debates of the 1850 Constitutional Convention
Volume 101, Page 698   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

698


Ordered, That it be entered on the Journal, that Mr. James U.
Dennis, has been called home by the illness of a member of his
family.

Mr Magraw, moved that further proceedings under the calf of
the Gorivention, on the order submitted by Mr. Howard, be dis
pensed with.

Determined in the affirmative.

The Convention then resumed the consideration of said order.

The quest ion being on the motion of Mr. Hearn, to lay said
order and amendment on the table.

The yeas and nays previously ordered were taken and appeared
as follows

AFFIRMATIVE—Messrs. Chapman, President, Morgan, Blak is-
tone, Dent, Hopewell, Lee, Chambers of Kent, Dorsey, Wells,
Randall, Sellman, Dalrymple, Bond, Sollers, John Dennis, Wil
liams, Hicks, Hodson, Goldsborough, Eccleston, Bowie, Sprigg,
McCubbin, Dirickson, McMaster, Hearn, Fooks, Jacobs, Schley,
Davis, Kilgour and aters—32.

NEGATIVE—Messrs. Ricaud, Donaldson ,Weems,Brent of Charles,
Jenifer, Howard ,Buchanan, Bell, Welch, Ridgely, Lloyd, Sherwood,
of Tal., Colston, Dashiell, Phelps, Constable, McCullough, Miller,
McLane, Tuck, Bowling, Spencer, Grason, George, Wright,
Thomas, Shriver, Gaither, Biser, An nan, Sappington, Stephenson,
McHenry, Magraw, Nelson, Carter, Thawley, Stewart of Caroline,
Hardcastle, Gwinn, Stewart of Balt, city, Brent of Balt, city,
Sherwood of Balt, city, Ware, Fiery, Neill, John Newcomer,
Harbine, Michael Newcomer, Brewer, Anderson, Weber, Holly
day, Fitzpatrick, Smith, Parke, Ege, Shower, Cockey and
Brown—60.
So the Convention refused to lay the order on the table.
Tire question then recurred on the adoption of the amendment
as offered by Mr. Biser, to said order.
Mr. Biser withdrew the amendment offered by him.
The question then recurred on the adoption of the order;
Mr. Chambers, of Kent, moved for a division of the question
upon each branch of said order.
The question was then put on the ist branch of said order, being
in these words: "Ordered, that after the 10th inst., no article orsec
tion of the proposed constitution, shall be adopted or considered,
and no article or section adopted on or before that day shall be
afterwards reconsidered without the unanimous consent of the
Convention;"
Mr. Howard, moved the question be taken by yeas and nays,
and being ordered appeared as follows:
AFFIRMATIVE-----Messrs. Morgan, Hopewell, Ricaud, Lee,
Chambers of Kent, Donaldson, Kent, Bond, Brent, of Charles,


 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings and Debates of the 1850 Constitutional Convention
Volume 101, Page 698   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives