clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings and Debates of the 1850 Constitutional Convention
Volume 101, Page 666   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

666

The question again recurred on the adoption of the amendment
as offered by Mr. Fitzpatrick and amended on the motion of Mr.
Ridgely;

Mr. Spencer moved for a division of the question which was put
upon striking out; and

Determined the affirmative.

The question then recurred on the adoption of the amendment
as offered by Mr. Fitzpatrick, and amended on the motion of Mr.
Ridgely;
Mr. Harbine offered as a substitute for said amendment the fol
lowing:
"At its first session after the adoption of this constitution reduce
and so graduate the fees and perquisites of the registers of wills in
the several counties and city of Baltimore, that no one of them
shall receive more than a fair and reasonable compensation for
performing the duties of his office ;"
Which was read.
On the question being put,
"Will the Convention accept said substitute?"
Mr. John Newcomer, moved the question be taken by yeas
and nays, and being ordered appeared as follows:
AFFIRMATIVE —Messrs. Lee, Dickinson, Sherwood of Talbot,
Tuck, Grason, George, Fooks, Jacobs, Thomas, Shriver,
Stephenson, Magraw, Nelson, Carter, Schtey, Fiery, John
Newcomer, Harbine, Michael Newcomer, Brewer, Anderson
and Parke—22.
NEGATIVE—Messrs. Chapman, Pres't, Morgan, Dent, Hopewell,
Ricaud, Mitchell, Dorsey, Wells, Randall, Kent, Weems, Brent,
of Charles, Jenifer, Howard, Bell, Welch, Ridgely, John Dennis,
James U. Dennis, Dashiell, Hicks, Goldsborough, Phelps,
McCullough, Miller, Bowie, Sprigg, Wright, Dirickson,
McMaster, Johnson, Gaither, Annan, McHenry, Thawley,
Stewart of Caroline, Gwinn, Stewart of Balt, city, Brent, of Balt.
city, Sherwood, of BaIt. city, Waters, Weber, Hollyday,
Fitzpatrick, Smith, Shower, Cockey and Brown—48.
So the Convention refused to accept the substitute.
The question again recurred on the adoption of the amend
ment as offered by Mr. Fitzpatrick and amended on the motion of
Mr. Ridgely ;
Mr. Howard, moved the question be taken by yeas and nays
and being ordered, appeared as follows
AFFIRMATIVE—Messrs. Morgan, Dent, Hopewell, Ricaud,
Chambers of Kent, Dorsey, Howard, Bell, Welch, Ridgely,
John Dennis, James U. Dennis, Grason, George, McMaster,
Thomas; Shriver, Johnson, Annan, Stephenson, Nelson, Carter,


 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings and Debates of the 1850 Constitutional Convention
Volume 101, Page 666   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives