clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings and Debates of the 1850 Constitutional Convention
Volume 101, Page 659   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

659

shall not thereby lose his right to vote in the district in which he
may have resided forthe six months next preceding his removal."
Mr. Tuck moved for a division of the question upon the 3rd
branch of the amendment down to the word "constitution" in the
8th line inclusive;
Mr. Tuck moved the question be taken by yeas and nays, and
being ordered appeared as follows
AFFIRMATIVE.—Messrs. Donaldson, Dorsey, Randall, Sell-
man, Brent of Charles, Merrick, Howard, Bell, Welch, Chand
ler, Ridgely, Lloyd, Dickinson, Sherwood of Talbot, Colston,
Chambers, of Cecil, McCullough, McLane, Spencer, Thomas,
Shriver, Johnson, Gaither, Biser, Annan, McHenry, Magraw,
Schley, Fiery, Neill, John Newcomer, Harbine, Brewer, Anderson,
Weber, Smith, Cockey and Brown—38.
NEGATIVE—Messrs. Chapman, Pres't, Morgan, Dent, Hope
well, Ricaud, Lee, Chambers of Kent, Mitchell, Wells, Kent,
Weems, Bond, Jenifer, Buchanan, John Dennis, James U.
Dennis, Dashiell, Williams, Hicks, Hodson, Goldsborough,
Eccleston, Phelps, Miller, Bowie, Tuck, Sprigg, McCubbin,
Bowling, Grason, George, Wright, Dirickson, McMaster, Hearn,
Fooks, Jacobs, Sappington, Stephenson, Nelson, Carter, Thawley,
Stewart, of Caroline, Gwinn, Stewart, of Balt. city, Brent, of
Baltimore city, Sherwood, of Balt, city, Ware, Davis, Kilgour,
Waters, Hollyday, Fitzpatrick, Parke and Shower—55.
So the 3rd branch of said amendment was rejected.
Mr. Johnson with the consent of the Convention, then with
drew the 4th and last branch of the amendment.
Mr. McHenry moved the convention reconsider their vote taken
on the 1st branch of the amendment
Determined in the affirmative.
The question then recurred on the adoption of the amendment;
On motion of Mr. Chambers of Kent,
Said amendment was amended by adding at the end thereof
the following:
"The Legislature at its first session shall pass such laws as may
be necessary to lay off the city of Baltimore into ten districts to be
composed of compact. contiguous wards, and as nearly as may be
of equal population;"
Mr. Thomas then offered as a substitute for said amendment as
amended, the following:
"In order that each and every portion of the State may be fair
rably represented and its various interests protected in the Legisla
ture for the purpose of electing delegates therein, each county in
the State and the city of Baltimore shall be divided into separate
election districts of compact, contiguous territory, in the manner'
hereafter to be provided in this Constitution; the qualified voters
in each of which districts shall at the time and in the manner in


 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings and Debates of the 1850 Constitutional Convention
Volume 101, Page 659   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives