clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings and Debates of the 1850 Constitutional Convention
Volume 101, Page 627   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

627

Sherwood of Balt. city, Fiery, Michael Newcomer, Brewer, An
derson and Cockey—24.
So the Convention reconsidered their vote on said article.
The question then recurred on the adoption of said article;
Mr. Schley, moved the previous question, and being seconded,
The question was put,
Will the Convention adopt said section as the 11th article?
Mr. Spencer, moved the question be taken by yeas and nays,
and being ordered appeared as follows:
A FFIRMATIVE—Messrs. Buchanan, Welch, Lloyd, Dickinson,
Dashiell, Spencer, Wright, McMaster, Hearn, Fooks, Jacobs,
McHenry, Carter, Thawiey, Stewart of Balt. city, Sherwood of
Balt, city, Fiery, Michael Newcomer, Brewer, Andersou, Holly
day, Slicer, Cockey and Brown-----24.

NEGATIVE—Messrs. Chapman, Pres't, Morgan, Blakistone,
Dent, Hopewell, Ricaud, Lee, Chambers, of Kent, Mitchell,
Donaldson, Dorsey, Wells, Randall, Sellman, Brent of Charles,
Howard, John Dennis, James, U. Dennis, Crisfield, Williams,
Hicks, Hodson, Goldsborough, Miller, McLane, Bowling, Grason,
Gaither, Biser, Annan, Gwinn, Brent, or Balt. city, Schley, Neill,
John Newcomer, Harbine, Davis, Smith, Parke and Shower—41.
So the amendment as the 11th section was rejected.
Mr. Brown, moved to postpone the consideration of the order of
the day, for the purpose of enabling him to offer the following ad
ditional rule
"A motion to postpone indefinitely, shall be decided without
debate."
On the question being put on postponing the consideration of the
order of the day; it was
Determined in the negative.
Mr. Spencer, gave notice that he should at some other time, move
to reconsider the vote of the Convention just taken on the amend-
ment submitted by him as the 11th section of the report.
Mr. Neill, moved to reconsider the vote of the Convention adopt
ing an amendment on yesterday offered by Mr. Spencer, as the
13th section of the report of the Judiciary committee.
Mr. Spencer, moved the question be taken by yeas and nays,
and being ordered, appeared as follows:
AFFIRMATIVE—Messrs. C haprnan, Pres't, Morgan, Blakistone,
Dent, Hopewell, Ricaud, Chambers of Kent, Mitchell, Donald
son, Dorsey, Wells, Randall, Kent, Sellman, Brent, of Charles,
Howard, John Dennis, James U. Dennis, Crisfield, Williams,
Hicks, Hodson, Goldsborough, Eccleston, Bowling, Grason,
Gaither, Biser, Annan, Brent of Balt, city, Schley, Fiery, Neill,
John Newcomer, and Cockey----39.


 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings and Debates of the 1850 Constitutional Convention
Volume 101, Page 627   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives