clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings and Debates of the 1850 Constitutional Convention
Volume 101, Page 614   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

614

Mr. Fitzpatrick, moved to amend said substitute by adding at
at the end thereof the following proviso
"Provided no practice or system of pleading other than those
now existing, be introduced into said Orphans' court;"
Mr. Grason, moved the previous question, that is
Shall the main question be now put?
On motion of Mr. Bowie,
The yeas and nays were ordered, and appeared as follows:
AFFIRMATIVE—Messrs. Sellman, Howard, Lloyd, Dickinson,
Chambers, of Cecil, Miller, Spencer, Grason, George, Wright,
Fooks, Thomas, Johnson, Gaither, Biser, Annan, Sappington,
McHenry, Neison, Thawley, Gwinn, Stewart, of Balt. city,Brent, of
Balt. city, Sherwood of Balt. city, Ware, Fiery, John Newcomer,
Harbine, Michael Newcomer, Davis, Brewer, Weber, Hollyday,
Slicer, Fitzpatrick, Parke, Shower, Cockey and Brown—39.
NEGATIVE—Messrs. Chapman, Pres't, Morgan, Blakistone,
Dent, Hopewell, Ricaud, Lee, Chambers of Kent, Mitchell,
Donaldson, Dorsey, Wells, Randall, Dalrymple, Bond, Jenifer,
Buchanan, John Dennis, James U. Dennis, Dashiell, Williams,
Hicks, Hodson, Goldsborough, Eccleston, McLane, Bowie,
Sprigg, McCubbin, Dirickson, McMaster, Hearn, Jacobs,
Magraw, Schley, Kilgour, Waters, Anderson and Smith—39.
So the Convention refused] to sustain the previous question.
The question was then put on the amendment as offered by
Mr. Fitzpatrick, to the substitute offered by Mr. Chambers of
Kent; and
Determined in the affirmative.
The question then recurred and was put,
Will the Convention accept the substitute as offered by Mr.
Chambers of Kent, and amended on the motion of Mr. Fitzpa
trick, for the 10th section of the report?
Mr. Stewart of Balt. city, moved the question be taken by yeas
and nays, and being ordered appeared as follows:
A FFIRMATIVE —Messrs. Lee, Chambers, of Kent, Mitchell,
Crisfield, Williams, McCubhin, Spencer, Wright, Dirickson,
McMaster, Hearn, Fooks, Jacobs, McHenry, Magraw, John
Newcomer, Brewer, Weber and Fitzpatrick—19.
NEGATIVE—Messrs. Chapman, Pres't, Morgan, Blakistone,
Pent, Hopewell, Ricaud, Dorsey, Wells, Randall, Sellrnan,
Dairymple, Jenifer, Howard, Buchanan, Lloyd, Dickinson,
John Dennis, James U. Dennis, Dashiell, Hicks, Hodson,
Goldsborough, Eccleston, Chambers, of Cecil, Miller, McLane,
Bowie, Sprigg, Grason, George, Thomas, Johnson, Gaither,
Biser, Annan, Sappington, Nelson, Thawley, Gwinn, Stewart,
of Baltimore city, Sherwood, of Baltimore city, Ware, Schley,
Fiery, Neill, Harbine, MichaeL Newcomer, Davis, Kilgour,


 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings and Debates of the 1850 Constitutional Convention
Volume 101, Page 614   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives