clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings and Debates of the 1850 Constitutional Convention
Volume 101, Page 612   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

612

fraud, and enforce the just application of the property of insol
vent persons to the payment of their debts."
Which was read.
Mr. Johnson moved the question be taken by yeas and nays,
and being ordered, appeared as follows:
AFFIRMATIVE. —Messrs. Chapman, Pres't, Ricaud, Donaldson,
Dorsey, Wells, Howard, Dickinson, Crisfield, Dashiell, Williams,
flicks, Hodson, Goldsborough, Eccleston, McC ullough, Miller,
Wright, MoMaster, Hearn, Fooks, Jacobs, Davis, Waters and
Shower—24.
NEGATIVE— -Messrs. Blakistone, Dent, Hopewell, Lee,
Mitchell, Randall, Dalrymple, Buchanan, Lloyd, John Dennis,
James U. Dennis, McLane, Bowie,Tuck, Sprigg, McOubbin,
Spencer, Grason, George, Dirickson, Thomas, Johnson, Gaither,
Biser, Annan Sappington, McHenry, Magraw, Nelson, Thawley,
Gwinn, Stewart, of Balt. city, Brent, of Baltimore city, Sher
wood, of Bali. city, Schley, Fiery, Neill, John Newcomer, Harbine,
Michael Newcomer, Kilgour, Brewer, Anderson, Weber, Holly.
day, Slicer, Fitzpatrick, Smith, Parke, Cockey and Brown—56,
So the Convention refused to reconsider their vote.
On motion of Mr. Buchanan, it was
Ordered, That it be entered on the Journal, that Mr. Welch, is
detained from his Seat in the Convention by indisposition.
The Convention then resumed the consideration of the order
of the day, being the report submitted by Mr. Bowie, chairman
of the committee on the Judiciary.
The question pending on Saturday before the Convention,
being on the amendment offered by Mr. Spencer.
Mr. Brown, moved the Convention reconsider their vote of
Saturday, rejecting the amendment offered by Mr. Michael New
comer, as the 10th section of the report.
Mr. Brown, moved the question be taken by yeas and nays,
Which were ordered.
On motion of Mr. Crisfield,
The Convention was called.
On motion of Mr. Brown,
Further proceedings under the call was dispensed with.
The yeas and nays were then taken, and appeared as follows:
AFFIRMATIVE—Messrs. Morgan, Blakistone, Hopewell, Dorsey,
Howard, Lloyd, Dickinson, Hicks, Hodson, Goldsborough, Eccles
ton, Miller, Grason, George, Hearn, Jacobs, Thomas, Johnson,
Gaither, Biser, Annan, Sappington, Nelson, Thawley, Gwinn,
Stewart, of Balt, city, Brent of Baltimore city, Sherwood, of
Balt. city, Ware, Schley, Fiery, Neill, John Newcomer, Harbine,
Michael Newcomer, Davis, Waters. Weber, Hollyday, Slicer,
Smith, Parke, Shower, Cockey and Brown—45.


 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings and Debates of the 1850 Constitutional Convention
Volume 101, Page 612   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives