clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings and Debates of the 1850 Constitutional Convention
Volume 101, Page 561   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

561

The Convention resumed the consideration of the order of the
day, being the report No. 13, submitted by Mr.. Bowie, as chair
man of the committee on the Judiciary.
The question pending before the Convention ôñ yesterday,
being on the amendment offered by Mr. Donaldson, to the 5th
section of said report.
Mr. Donaldson, moved for a division of the question upon
striking out.
After debate thereon,
Mr. Spencer, moved that the Convention do now adjourn until
Monday morning, there being only sixty-four members now in at
tendance.
Mr. Johnson, rose to a point of order, that the motion of Mr.
Spencer, being accompanied with reasons for the adjournment,
that the motion was not in order.
The chair stated that the motion to adjourn was in order, but
could not be accompanied with reasons for the motion.
Mr. Spencer, then withdrew the reasons, and moved the Con
vention adjourn.
On this motion, he moved the question be taken by yeas and
nays, and being ordered appeared as follows:
AFFIRMATIVE—Messrs. -Morgan, Lee, Mitchell, Donaldson,
Dorsey, Wells, Randall, Weems, John Dennis and Spencer—lO.
NEGATIVE—Messrs. Ricaud, Prest. pro tem., Chambers of
Kent, Merrick, Howard, Buchanan, Bell, Welch, Lloyd,
Sherwood of Talbot, Colston, Crisfield, Dashiell, Hicks, Golds
borough, Eccleston, Phelps, Miller, Bowie, Tuck, Sprigg, Bow
ling, Grason, George, right, Dirickson, McMaster, Hearn,
Fooks, Jacobs, Shriver, Johnson ,Gaither, Biser, Annan, Sapping.
ton, Stephenson, McHenry, Magraw, Nelson, Stewart of Caro
line, Hardcastle, Gwinn, Sherwood of Balt. city, Ware, Schley,
Fiery, Neill, Harbine, Kilgour, Brewer, Anderson, Weber, Holly
day, Slicer, Smith, Parke and Shower—58.
So the Convention refused to adjourn.
The question then recurred upon the motion of Mr. Donaldson,
to strike out.
Mr. Spencer, (with the consent of the Convention) withdrew
the substitute offered by him on yesterday, for the 5th section of
the report.
Mr. Crisfield, (with the consent of the Convention,) also with
drew the substitute offered by hiim for the 5th section of said report.
The question again recurred upon the motion of Mr. Donald
son, for a division of the question upon striking out.
On the question being put on striking out,

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
71



 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings and Debates of the 1850 Constitutional Convention
Volume 101, Page 561   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives