clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings and Debates of the 1850 Constitutional Convention
Volume 101, Page 553   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 
 
553

THURSDAY, April 17th, 1851.

The Convention met,
Prayer by the Rev. Mr. Griffith.
The Proceedings of yesterday were read.
Mr. Biser, gave notice that on to-morrow he should move to
reconsider the vote of the Convention upon the proviso submitted
by Mr. Brent, of Balt. city, on the 9th inst., to the 43rd section
of the report, of the committee on the Legislative Department,
being in these words:
"Provided that the said funds shall be distributed so as to return
the proportions respectively paid in by each county and Baltimore
city, and the residue to be distributed equitably according to the
white population of this State, for pm poses of Education;"
The Convention then resumed the consideration of the unfin
ished business of yesterday, being the article offered by Mr. Tuck,
as an additional section to the report creating a Board of Public
Works.
After debate thereon,
Mr. Buchanan, moved the previous question, that is
"Shall the main question be now put ?"
Mr. Buchanan, moved the question be taken by yeas and nays,
and being ordered appeared as follows
AFFIRMATIVE—- Messrs. Donaldson, Sell man, Dairymple,
Howard, Buchanan, Bell, Welch, Ridgely, Lloyd, Dickinson,
Sherwood, of Talbot, Coiston, McCullough, Miller, Spencer,
Grason, George, Thomas, Shriver, Gaither, Biser, Annan,
Magraw, Nelson, Stewart, of Caroline, Hardcastle, Gwinn,
Stewart, of Balt. city, Brent, of Balt. city, Sherwood, of Balt. city,
Ware, Schley, Neill, John Newcomer, Harbine, Brewer, Weber,
Hollyday, Slicer, Fitzpatrick, Parke, Shower, Cockey and
Brown—44.
NEGATIVE—Messrs. Chapman, Pres't. Morgan, Blakistone,
Hopewell, Ricaud, Lee, Chambers, of Kent, Mitchell, Dorsey,
Wells, Randall, Kent, Weems, Bond, Brent, of Charles, John
Dennis, Crisfield, Dashiell, Hicks, Goldsborough, Eccleston,
Bowie, Tuck, Sprigg, McCubbin, Bowling, Dirickson, McMaster,
Hearn, Fooks, Jacobs, Davis and Smith—33.
So the previous question was sustained.
The question was then put on the adoption of the amendment
as offered by Mr. Tuck;
Mr. Tuck, moved the question be taken by yeas and nays, and
being ordered, appeared as follows;
AFFIRMATIVE—Messrs. Chapman, Pres't, Lee, Chambers, of
Kent, Mitchell, Donaldson, Randall, Kent, Weems, Dalrymple,

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
70



 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings and Debates of the 1850 Constitutional Convention
Volume 101, Page 553   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives