clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings and Debates of the 1850 Constitutional Convention
Volume 101, Page 540   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 
 
540

any office, that has been or shall be created, made vacant, or other
wise regulated by the constitution, now in preparation, within the
space of five years after such constitution shall go into operation;"
Which was read.
Mr. Sollers, moved to amend said amendment by striking omit
these words, "within the space of five years," and inserting in lieu
thereof the word ‘‘forever;"
Mr. Sollers, withdrew said amendment.
The question then recurred upon the adoption of the amend
ment as offered by Mr. Hicks;
Mr. Hicks, moved the question be taken by yeas and nays, and
being ordered appeared as follows
AFFIRMATIVE.-------Messrs. Morgan, Chambers, of Kent, Donald
son, Dorsey, Wells, Randall, Sellman, John Dennis, Dashiell,
Williams, Hicks, Goldsborough, Eccleston, Tuck, Sprigg, McMas
ter, Fiery, Neill, John Newcomer, Harbine, Michael Newcomer,
Davis, Brewer, Smith and Cockey—25.
NEGATIVE —Messrs. Chapman, Pres't, Blakistone, Hopewell,
Ricaud, Sollers, Brent, of Charles, Merrick, Jenifer, Howard,
B uchanan, Welch, Dickinson, McCullough, Miller, Spencer,
Hearn, Thomas, Shriver, Biser, An nan, McHenry, Magraw,
Nelson, Thawley, Gwinn, Brent, of Balt. city, Sherwood, of Balt.
city, Ware, Schley, Anderson, Weber, Hollyday, Slicer, Shower
and Brown—35.

So the amendment was rejected.

The said report having been read through and adopted;
Mr. Thomas, moved the Convention lake up for consideration
the report submitted by Mr. Jenifer, chairman of committee No.
14, creating a Board of Public Works;
Mr. Brown, moved the question be taken by yeas and nays,
and being ordered appeared as follows:

AFFIRMATIVE—Messrs. Morgan, Ricaud, Chambers, of Kent,
Sellman, Howard, Welch, Dickinson, McCullough, Miller, Tuck,
Spencer, Thomas. Shriver, Biser, Amman, McHenry, Mcgraw,
Nelson, Thawley, Gwinn, Brent, of Balt. city, Sherwood, of
Balt. city, Ware, Neill, John Newcomer, Harbine, Michael
Newcomer, Brewer, Anderson, Weber, Hollyday, Cockey and
Brown—33.
NEGATIVE—Messrs. Chapman, Pres't, Blakistone, Hopewell,
Donaldson, Dorsey, Wells, Randall, Sollers, Brent, of Charles,
Merrick, Jenifer, Buchanan, John Dennis, Crisfield, Dashiell,
Williams, Hicks, Goldsborough, Eceleston, Sprigg, McMaster,
Hearn, Schley, Fiery, Davis, Slicer, Smith and Shower—28.
So the Convention determined to consider said report.
The said report of the committee No. 14, and the substitute
offered therefor by Mr. Thomas, on the 3rd inst.;


 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings and Debates of the 1850 Constitutional Convention
Volume 101, Page 540   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives