532

The question then recurred on the adoption of the amendment
as offered by Mr. Blakistone

Mr. Michael Newcomer, moved the question be taken by yeas
and nays,

Which motion was not sustained.

Mr. Blakistone, renewed the motion that the question be taken
by yeas and nays, and being ordered appeared as follows:

AFFIRMATIVE—Messrs. Blakistone, Sellman, Howard, Sher
wood, of Talbot, Colston, John Dennis, Eccleston, McCullough,
Tuck, George, McMaster, Annan, Stephenson, McHenry,
Magraw, Nelson, Carter, Thawley, Stewart, of Caroline, Schley,
Fiery, John Newcomer, Michael Newcomer, Weber, Slicer, Smith
and Cockey —27.

NEGATIVE—Messrs. Chapman, Pres't, Hopewell, Ricaud,
Mitchell, Donaldson, Dorsey, Randall, Welch, Ridgely, James
U. Dennis, Dashiell, Williams, Hicks, Hodson, Phelps, Bowie, Sprigg,
Dirickson, Hearri, Shriver, Biser, Brent, of Balt, city, Sherwood,
of Balt, city, Ware, Neill, Davis, Kilgour, Waters, Anderson,
Fitzpatrick, Shower and Brown—31.
So the amendment was rejected.
The question then recurred and was put on the adoption of the
order, and
Determined in the affirmative.
Mr. Bowie, moved the Convention adjourn;
Mr. Magraw, moved the question be taken by yeas and nays,
and being ordered appeared as follows:
AFFIRMATIvE—Messrs. Chapman, Pres't, Hopewell, Ricaud,
Mitchell, Donaldson, Dorsey, Randall, Ridgely, John Dennis,
James U. Dennis, Dashiell, Hicks, Hodson, Bowie, Tuck,
Sprigg, George, Dirickson, McMaster, Hearn, Biser, Thawley,
Neill and Kilgour—24.
NEGATIVE—-Messrs. Blakistone, Sellman, Howard, Welch,
Sherwood ,of Tal. Colston ,Williams, Eccleston , Phelps, McCullough,
Shriver, Annan, Stephenson, McHenry, Magraw, Nelson, Carter,
Stewart, of Caroline, Brent of Balt. city, Sherwood, of Balt. city,
Ware, Schley, Fiery, John Newcomer, Michael Newcomer, Davis,
Waters, Anderson, Weber, Slicer, Fitzpatrick, Smith, Shower,
Cockey and Brown—34.
Determined in the negative.
After further proceedings,
On motion,

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The Convention adjourned until to-morrow morning 9 o clock