clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings and Debates of the 1850 Constitutional Convention
Volume 101, Page 288   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

288

On motion of Mr. Howard, it was
Resolved, That the committee on amendments and revision of
the Constitution be instructed to enquire into the expediency of
inserting an article substantially as follows:

That in the year 1862, and every tenth year thereafter, it shall
be the duty of the Governor for the time being, to arrange the
representation in the House of Delegates, according to the ratio
adopted by this Convention, and to declare by Proclamation, the
number of Delegates to which each county and city may be en
titled according to the new census of the United States. And
in said Proclamation, he shall also invite the people of the State,
to vote on a day therein to be named, whether or not they desire
to hold a Convention for the purpose of altering the Constitution.
And in case a majority of those who vote, shall desire that a Con
vention according to the new basis of Representation, the Gover
nor shall take the same steps to organize the Convention, which
were followed as to the present.

On motion of Mr. Merrick,
The Convention resumed the consideration of the order of the
day, being the report submitted by Mr. Johnson, chairman of the
committee on the Legislative Department, on the 25th ultimo.

The question pen ding before the Convention on yesterday being
on the adoption of the 2nd section as amended.

On motion of Mr. Spencer,
The Convention was called and the doorkeeper sent for the
absent members.
On motion of Mr. Spencer,
Further proceedings under the call was dispensed with.
The question then recurred upon the adoption of the 2nd sec.
tion, as amended.
Mr. John Newcomer moved the previous question, that is,
"Shall the main question be now put'?"
Mr. Chambers, of Kent, moved the question be taken by yeas
and nays, and being ordered appeared as follows:
AFFIRMATIVE.—Messrs. Dairymple, Buchanan, Welch, Dickin
son, Phelps, Hearn, Annan, Stephenson, Nelson, Schley, Fiery,
Neill, John Newcomer, Harbine, Michael Newcomer, Brewer,
Parke and Oockey—1 8.
NEGATIVE.—Messrs. Chapman, President, Morgan, Ricaud,
Chambers, of Kent, Mitchell, Donaldson, Dorsey, Wells, Kent,
Merrick, Howard, Ridgeiy, Lloyd, Sherwood, of Talbot, John
Dennis, Williams, Hicks, Hodson,Miller, Tuck, Sprigg, Bowling,
Spencer, George, Wright, Dirickson, Jacobs, Thomas, Shriver,
Gaither, Biser, McHenry, Carter, Stewart, of Caroline, Presstman,
Ware, Waters, Anderson, Weber, Hollyday, Fitzpatrick, Smith,
Shower and Brown—44.


 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings and Debates of the 1850 Constitutional Convention
Volume 101, Page 288   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives