Volume 101, Page 278 View pdf image |
ratification, shall put the question distinctly to each voter: "are you in favor of annual or biennial sessions of the Legislature?" and the said Judges shall record separately on their poil books the answer of each voter to the said question; of which they shalE make return in the same manner as prescribed by law to ascertain the sense of the people on the rat ificat ion of said constitution. And if a majority of the legal voters in the State should be in favor of annual sessions, then at the next meeting of the Legisla ture after the ratification of this constitution, the Legislature shall provide by law for annual elections of Delegates to the General Assembly, and for annual sessions of the Legislature." Which was read. Mr. Shower moved for the previous question, that is: "Shall the main question be now put?" and it was Determined in the affirmative. The question was then put on the adoption of the amendment as offered by Mr. Spencer; Mr. Mitchell, moved for the yeas and nays, and being ordered, appeared as follows: AFFIRMATIVE—Messrs. Tuck, p. t., Morgan, Donald son, Dorsey, Wells, Randall, Kent, Sellman, Merrick, Buchanan, Welch, Chambers, of Cecil, Miller, Sprigg, Spencer, George, Wright, Shriver, Biser, Stephenson, McHenry, Mcgraw, Nelson, Stewart, of Caroline, Gwinn, Brent, of Balt. city, Presstman, Ware, Brewer, Anderson, Weber, Hollyday, Fitzpatrick, Parke, Shower, Cockey and Brown—37. NEGATIVE—MeSSrS. Ricaud, Chambers, of Kent, Mitchell,
|
||||
Volume 101, Page 278 View pdf image |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.