clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search		 search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings and Debates of the 1850 Constitutional Convention
Volume 101, Page 182   View pdf image
 Jump to  
   << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


182



The question then recurred upon the amenclmentas offered by
Mr. Chambers, of Kent, as a substitute for the 1st section of the
report.

Mr. Phelps moved to amend said amendment by inserting after
the words "Howard District," the following, "and thirty days in
the election district or ward of the city of Baltimore;"
Determined in the negative.

On motion of Mr. Phelps,
The yeas and nays were ordered and appeared as follows:
AFFIRMATIVE—Messrs. Chapman, President, Morgan, Dent,
Hopewell, Lee, Chambers, of Kent, Mitchell, Donaldson, I)orsey,
Wells, Kent, Weems, Dalrymple, Sollers, Merrick, John Dennis,
James U. Dennis, Crisfield, Dashiel, Williams, Hicks, Hodson,
Goldsborough, Eccleston, Phelps, Sprigg, Dirickson, McMaster,
Fooks, McHenry, Magraw, Davis and Waters—33.

NEGATIVE—Messrs. Blakistone, Seilman, Bond, Bell, Welch,
Chandler, Ridgely, Sherwood, of Talbot, Colston, Chambers,
of Cecil, McCullough, Miller, Bowie, McCubbin, Spencer,
Grason, George, Wright, Shriver, Gaither, Biser, Annan, Sapping-
ton, Stephenson, Nelson, Carter, Thawley, Stewart of Caroline,
Hardcastle, Gwinn, Brent, of Balt. city, Ware, Schley Fiery,
Neill, Harbine, Kilgour, Brewer, Anderson, Weber, Hollyday,
Slicer, Fitzpatrick, Smith, Parke, Shower, Cockey and Brown—48.

So the amendment was rejected.
Mr. Phelps, then moved to amend said amendment by inserting
after the words ‘‘Howard District," the following:

"And twenty days in the election district or ward of the City of
Baltimore ‘‘
Determined in the negative.
On motion of Mr. Brent, of Balt. city,
The yeas and nays were ordered and appeared as follows:
AFFIRMATIVE—Messrs. Chapman, President, Morgan, Dent,
Lee, Chambers, of Kent, Donaldson, Dorsey, Wells, Randall,
Kent, Weems, Dalrymple, Bond, Merrick, John Dennis, James
U. Dennis, Crisfield, Dashiell, Hicks, Hodson, Goldsborough,
Eccleston, Phelps, Spr igg, Dirickson, Mc Master, Hearn, Fooks,
McHenry, Magraw, Davis and Waters—32.

NEGATIVE.—Messrs. Blakistone, Sellman, Jenifer, Bell, Welch,
Chandler, Ridgely, Sherwood of Talbot, Colston, Chambers of Cecil,
McCullough, Miller, Bowie, McCubbin, Spencer, Grason, George,
Wright, Shriver, Gaither, Biser, Annan, Sappington, Stephenson,
Nelson, Carter, Thawley, Stewart, of Caroline, Hardcastle,
Gwinn, Brent, of BaIt. city, Ware, Schley, Fiery, Neill, John
Newcomer, Harbine, Kilgour, Brewer, Anderson, Weber, Holly-
day, Slicer, Fitzpatrick, Smith, Parke, Shower, Cockey and
Bro wn—49.

 
 
So the amendment was rejected.





  		clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings and Debates of the 1850 Constitutional Convention
Volume 101, Page 182   View pdf image
 Jump to  
   << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.

Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!

An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives