clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings of the Maryland Court of Appeals, 1695-1729
Volume 77, Page 300   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

3oo MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS

petration of the Original Writ in this Cause (to wit) the tenth day of August
Anno Domi Seventeen hundred and Nineteen at Calvert County afsd he the
said Thomas Lingan Offered to pay and Satisfie to the said Daniel Dulany
the Damages and Costs afsd out of the said goods and Chatties and the same
Thomas Lingan always afterwards was and Still is ready to pay the same to
the said Daniel Dulany if the said Daniel Dulany would accept thereof And
this he is ready to verifie wherefore he prays Judgmt if the afsd Attorney Gen-
eral the Action afsd against him to have Ought etc:

And the same Attorney Genll saith that the afsd plea by the afsd Thomas
above by rejoynder pleaded and the matter in the same Contained is not Suf-
ficient in Law the same Attorney Genll from the Action afsd to preclude and
that he to that plea in manner and form afsd pleaded hath no need nor by the
Law of the Land is held to Answer for that that the afsd Plea above by re-
joynder Pleaded Departs from the Plea of the afsd Thomas above by pleading
pleaded and that plea by way of rejoynder is Contradictory and this he is
ready to verifie wherefore as before prays Judgmt for the Debt afsd together
with the Damages Occasioned by the Detention of that Debt to be to him the
said Lord Propry Adjudged.

And the afsd Thomas Lingan for that he hath above in his rejoynder
pleaded Alledged sufft matter in Law to barr the afsd [458] Attorney General
from having his Action afsd against him the same Thos Lingan which he is
ready to verifie which matter the afsa Attorney Genll hath not gainesayed
nor thereunto in any ways answered but the same to admit for True hath
altogether refused as before prays Judgment and that the said Attorney
Genll from his Action afsd against him the same Thomas Lingan may be
barred etc.

Whereupon all and Singular the premisses, being by the Court here
seen heard and fully understood and mature deliberation being thereupon
had for that it seems to the Court of his Lordship the Lord proprietor here,
that the afsd Thomas Lingan hath above in his Rejoynder pleaded Alledged
Sufft matter in Law to barr the afsd Attorney Genll from having his Action
afd against him the same Thomas Lingan.

Therefore it is Considered by the Justices here the 20th day of September
Anno Domi 1720 afsa that the said Thomas Bordley Esqr his Ldships Attor-
ney Genll who for his Lordship prosecuteth as afsd take nothing by the Writ
afsd and that the said Thomas Lingan goe thereof without day.

And also it is Considered by the Justices here that the said Thomas
Lingan recover against the afsd Daniel Dulany (at whose request this Action
was brought) the sum of one thousand and forty pounds of Tobacco by the
Court here Adjudged unto him for his Costs and Charges in this behalf laid
out and Expended According to the forme of the Act of Assembly in that
Case made and provided etc.

Afterwards to wit the same Court or term the said Daniel Dulany prays


 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings of the Maryland Court of Appeals, 1695-1729
Volume 77, Page 300   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives