clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings and Debates of the 1867 Constitutional Convention
Volume 74, Volume 1, Debates 97   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space
committee, was handed down to us from our forefathers
from the good old times of 1776, and the committee had
thought it proper to continue this article.
Mr. Barnes said the Convention was not legislating for
the times of 1776. They were sent here to frame a form
of government comformable to the present times.
Mr. Brown had at first been in favor of the amendment
suggested by his colleague from Baltimore city. He
wished to get rid of an assertion which is in fact a fal-
lacy. The assertion that all government is founded in
compact only had long since been exploded, but the
amendment does not meet the case. The right asserted
in article 6 is a revolutionary right; the right asserted
in article 1 is a right founded on law. There might be ob-
jection to the old-fashioned phraseology of article 1, and
he would prefer to exclude the fallacious assertion made^
in it, but, upon the whole, he thought it had better re-
main.
Mr. Jones said the language of this article had been
fully considered in committee, and they had finally come
to the conclusion to adhere to the time-honored forms.
Mr. Nelson did not believe that government originates
from the people. He believed that all power emanates and
is derived from the Supreme God, who rules over us all.
He desired to submit a substitute for the proposition of
the gentleman from Baltimore city, as follows:
"That all powers are derived from God and properly
administered by the people, and that all persons in-
vested, " &c.
After some further discussion, the Convention, on mo-
tion of Mr. Alvey, went into committee of the whole, (Mr.
Dent, of St. Mary's, in the chair. ) but without taking any
action, the committee, on motion of Mr. Carter, rose.
The consideration of the report on the Declaration of
Rights was then resumed by the Convention.
Mr. Jones moved for a division of the motion of the
gentleman from Baltimore city, (Mr. Barnes, ) and the
question being taken on the motion to strike out, it was
disagreed to, and the amendment was then decided in the
negative.
97


 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings and Debates of the 1867 Constitutional Convention
Volume 74, Volume 1, Debates 97   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives