clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings and Debates of the 1867 Constitutional Convention
Volume 74, Volume 1, Debates 468   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space
members all over the hall express a desire for informa-
tion on this subject, and gentlemen still expressed a de-
sire for more light. He thought it but due to those gen-
tlemen who desire to express their views that they should
be heard, and this motion to cut off debate came with a
bad grace from a delegation that had occupied so much
of the time of this Convention, it having even taken a
recess for their benefit without having received any light.
The motion of Mr. Stoddert was agreed to.
The committee then rose, and the Convention, at 9. 15
P. M., adjourned.
SEVENTY-THIRD DAY.
ANNAPOLIS, THURSDAY, AUGUST 15.
The report of the committee to whom was referred all
such parts of the present constitution as had not been re-
ferred to other committees was taken up on its third read-
ing, and certain amendments of the committee on re-
vision and compilation agreed to. The bill was then
passed—yeas 96, nays 5.
Mr. Lee, from the committee on revision and compila-
tion, reported that every article which had passed to a
second reading had been reported by the committee,
finally passed and adopted into the constitution. The only
business before the Convention was the report of the com-
mittee on public works, now on its second reading.
On motion of Mr. Carter, the vote passing the order
providing for an adjournment on today, 15th instant, at
two o'clock, was reconsidered and the order laid on the
table.
The Convention then resolved itself into committee of
the whole (Mr. Dent, of St. Mary's, in the chair) on the
report of the committee on public works, the question be-
ing on the motion of Mr. Syester to strike out the third
section, relating to the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal.
Mr. Stoddert took the floor and made an elaborate and
able argument in favor of the section as reported. He
contended that all experience had proved that public
works could only be properly and efficiently carried on
under private management.
468


 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings and Debates of the 1867 Constitutional Convention
Volume 74, Volume 1, Debates 468   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives