clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings and Debates of the 1867 Constitutional Convention
Volume 74, Volume 1, Debates 423   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space
The report of the committee on the Attorney General
and the State's Attorneys was taken up on its third read-
ing, and certain verbal amendments from the committee
on revision and compilation were agreed to.
Mr. Ford asked to open the report to an amendment to
provide that the Attorney General shall be elected by the
people instead of appointed by the Governor. The Con-
vention elected to entertain the amendment, which was
opposed by Mr. Archer and advocated by Mr. Ford, after
which it was adopted.
The section was further amended so as to provide that
the Attorney General to be elected at the general election
in November next shall immediately assume the duties of
his office.
Mr. Mackubin asked to open the second section to an
amendment, so as to reduce the salary of the Attorney
General to $2, 000; which was not agreed to.
Mr. Archer moved an amendment to the eighth section,
providing that the State's Attorney for Baltimore city
shall receive a salary of $4, 000 per annum; which was
rejected.
On motion of Mr. Longwell, the vote refusing to open
the second section to amendment was reconsidered, and
after the rejection of several amendments, the salary of
the Attorney General was left at $3, 000, as provided for
in the report.
The bill was then passed; yeas 76, nays 21—Messrs.
Bell, Brewer of Montgomery, Cosgrove, Cover, Cunning-
ham, Emack, Gault, Groome, Hoblitzel, Horsey of Som-
erset, Lee, Manro, McKaig, Morris, Nicolai, Parker, John
Parran, Poole, Starr, Stoddert and Syester.
Part four of the judiciary report, relative to the system
to be adopted for the city of Baltimore, was taken up.
Section 28 was read.
Mr. Carter submitted the following as a substitute:
"The Superior Court of Baltimore city, the Court of
Common Pleas and the Baltimore City Court shall each
have concurrent jurisdiction in all civil common law cases,
and concurrently all the jurisdiction which the Superior
423


 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings and Debates of the 1867 Constitutional Convention
Volume 74, Volume 1, Debates 423   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  November 18, 2025
Maryland State Archives