clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings and Debates of the 1867 Constitutional Convention
Volume 74, Volume 1, Debates 417   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space
these officers that no changes had been made in the mode
of exercising the functions of their offices, and neither
had any change been made in the system under which
the clerks and registers of wills and Orphans' Court
judges worked. This was a grave question, and the Con-
vention would do well to consider it. In regard to these
two gentlemen he personally knew nothing of the manner
in which they had performed their functions, but the
exalted official character which had been given them was
a sufficient reason why they should go once more before
the people, and submit their claims to them. Personal
considerations should not weigh a feather before public
exigencies.
Mr. Roman had offered his amendment on the ground
of high principle alone. He had voted for the retention
of the Governor, not for the reasons of some of his col-
leagues, but because he was opposed on principle to legis-
lating men out of office. He wished to go home to his
people and prove to them that the whole object of this
Convention had not been to turn men out of office. What
charges had been brought against these officers? Had
they neglected any of their high duties? These officers
were State officers, they stood on the same footing to-
wards this Convention as the Governor, and no distinction
should be made between them.
Mr. Kilbourn said there was no injustice done in the
section as it stood. Those two distinguished gentlemen
had the same opportunity as any other citizens of the
State to go before the people in one case and the Legis-
lature in the other, and prefer their claims to re-election.
He could see no wrong in this. But the amendment of
the gentleman from Allegany proposed that this Conven-
tion should usurp the power of the people and the Legis-
lature.
Mr. Brown was so much opposed to turning out officers
that he was at first in favor of the amendment, but after
the debate which had taken place, he was constrained to
change his opinion.
Mr. Syester liked to hear the songs to principle, but
would prefer to see gentlemen dancing to their own tunes.
Gentlemen who had voted for retaining the Governor
417


 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings and Debates of the 1867 Constitutional Convention
Volume 74, Volume 1, Debates 417   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  November 18, 2025
Maryland State Archives