clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings and Debates of the 1867 Constitutional Convention
Volume 74, Volume 1, Debates 392   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space
from the people who resided without the limits. The
friends of this measure had expected to encounter this
opposition, and they had come here prepared to dispel the
mists of error which it would be sought to throw around
the question. He contended that the principle which had
heretofore guided the formation of new counties had been
adhered to in the proposition before them. Mr. R. quoted
from statistics, and claimed that the population of the two
counties had increased in a sufficient ratio since 1860 as
to give them the minimum number of white inhabitants
prescribed by the constitution for each county, and re-
plied at length to the arguments of Mr. Page. He was
in favor now of this new county because it would pre-
serve the balance of power throughout the State, and
he commended this particularly to every county man. He
was glad to find that their friends from Baltimore went
for this, because they knew that Wicomico county would
always send a Democratic senator and delegates to these
halls to serve as an additional barrier against the en-
croachments of radicalism. He did not believe the taxa-
tion would be increased one dollar by the creation of this
new county. He stated as a fact that the money to erect
all the necessary public buildings would be raised in Salis-
bury.
Mr. Jones said one of the chief complaints against this
movement was that it took the people of Somerset and
Worcester completely by surprise. They had no idea
that it was to be agitated before this Convention. There
had been no memorials or petitions of late years, although
an effort had been made in this direction some years ago.
Mr. Rider said it had been discussed in the papers of
Princess Anne and Salisbury.
Mr. Jones said there might have been some fugitive
newspaper articles, but no memorial had come up to the
last Legislature, and the town of Salisbury was then rep-
resented by a very competent gentleman. His colleague's
assumption of the increase of population was entirely con-
jecture, and would, probably, not be borne out by the
facts. In regard to the petitions sent to this Convention,
there was very little difference in the number for and
against, and he had noticed several duplications of signa-
tures in the memorials in favor, and it was impossible to
392


 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings and Debates of the 1867 Constitutional Convention
Volume 74, Volume 1, Debates 392   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  November 18, 2025
Maryland State Archives