clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings and Debates of the 1867 Constitutional Convention
Volume 74, Volume 1, Debates 339   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space
needed light. He was opposed to any gag system, and in
favor of a full and free discussion on all subjects. There
were matters yet to come up here of the very greatest im-
portance. The Chesapeake and Ohio Canal question,
which affected the interests of the people of Maryland to
the amount of millions, was to come up yet, and he sub-
mitted that to understand it properly extended debate
was essential.
Mr. Kilbourn said the committee of the whole had but
rarely been resorted to, and then on the most important
questions, one of which was the judiciary report, which
they had been discussing for several days past. He cer-
tainly did not think that important matter had occupied
any more time than was absolutely necessary.
Mr. Vansant said the adoption of the order would not
interfere with the continuance of the committee of the
whole on the judiciary report.
Mr. Carter said this order was no attempt to choke off
debate. If this was a partisan Convention the committee
of the whole might be necessary for the protection of the
minority This was not the case here, the members of this
Convention being of one accord.
Mr. Jones advocated the adoption of the order, and al-
luded to the delay occasioned on the negro testimony ques-
tion, which had been thoroughly debated when the Decla-
ration of Rights was under consideration, and had also
been largely discussed on subsequent occasions.
The order was then adopted by a vote of 64 to 25.
The unfinished business, being the report of the com-
mittee on the judiciary, was then taken up, and the Con-
vention resolved itself into committee of the whole (Mr.
Dent, of St. Mary's, in the chair) for the consideration
of the subject.
Mr. Carter moved to take up the two supplementary
sections of the legislative article yet undisposed of.
Mr. Carter said the House was now very full—as full as
it was likely to be—and as the entire legislative article
could not be put in the hands of the committee on re-
vision for engrossment until these two sections were dis-
posed of, he hoped his motion would be agreed to.
339


 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings and Debates of the 1867 Constitutional Convention
Volume 74, Volume 1, Debates 339   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  Cannot perform flastmod(): Win32 Error Code = 2

Maryland State Archives