clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings and Debates of the 1867 Constitutional Convention
Volume 74, Volume 1, Debates 287   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space
The President appointed as the committee Messrs.
Barnes, Wethered, Garey, Nelson and Tarr of Caroline.
Section 47 was read, which provides that all persons
shall pay taxes in the place where they reside for the
greater part of the year.
Mr. Buchanan said this was purely a legislative matter,
and moved to strike out the entire section.
Mr. Brown said it was well known that a large amount
of property in the city of Baltimore escaped taxation,
and some of it escaped even county taxation. There were
a number of gentlemen who had their warehouses in the
city of Baltimore, derived their revenue from business in
that city, yet for a short period in the year took them-
selves to Baltimore county to escape the hot weather and
the burdens of taxation—some of them to the neighbor-
hood of the gentleman from Baltimore county, (Mr.
Buchanan. ) This was not just; the taxes in the city of
Baltimore were very high, $1. 43 on the $100 this year.
Mr. Barnes—And $250, 000 unprovided for.
Mr. Barry asked if they were legislating for Baltimore
city.
Mr. Brown said they were legislating for the whole
State, for Baltimore city and Baltimore county. Many
of the wealthy citizens of Baltimore had residences in
Baltimore county, where they resided a few months of
the year, and then claimed these country residences as
their domicils, and although they did business and had
the bulk of their means in Baltimore, they escaped city
taxation. This was not just to the other taxpayers of the
city. His friend, (Mr. Barry, ) asked if they were legis-
lating for Baltimore city, but this was a matter in which
the whole State was concerned, as the city of Baltimore
paid such a great proportion of the State taxes. A large
amount of taxable property in the city is personal prop-
erty, and the amount which escapes taxation can be
counted by millions. He expected to be met by the objec-
tion that this was a legislative matter, and beneath the
dignity of the Convention, but he maintained that it was
just as proper for the Constitution to fix the domicile of
the taxpayer as of the voter, and there was no reason
why it should not be put there.
287


 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings and Debates of the 1867 Constitutional Convention
Volume 74, Volume 1, Debates 287   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives