clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings and Debates of the 1867 Constitutional Convention
Volume 74, Volume 1, Debates 224   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space
gentleman would be fatal to the interests of their people.
He did not want any Legislature to regulate his business
for him. Was it to be supposed that the men composing
a Legislature knew more about his business than he die.
himself? Massachusetts thought she could teach the
whole world what to do, and was now intent on educating
the people of this country up to the advanced stage of
Northern ideas. He did not know whether they would
do it, but if they did, God help the country.
In regard to the public debt, no matter by what cor-
ruption it might have been created, he would regard it as
the greatest calamity that could happen if the national
credit should be dishonored. He did not take such a des-
pondent view of affairs. If the true old democratic party
was restored to power, he would look for the paying oil
of the debt within twenty years; they were capable of it
if they only had the Union and the constitution as it once
was.
It might happen that in a time of great commercial
revulsion it might be necessary to compromise with the
national creditors, as England did. England called her
creditors together and offered them three per cent. This
might do, but never repudiation.
The debate was continued by Messrs. McKaig, Jones,
Maulsby, Garey and Ritchie.
The question was then taken on the motion of Mr. Mer-
rick to strike out the entire article, when it was carried
by a vote of 50 to 43.
When Mr. Rennolds' name was called, he said that,
voting entirely different from all his colleagues, a word
of explanation might be necessary. If this was a legis-
lative body, he should be in favor of voting for this
article, with some slight modification, but he was opposed
to placing it beyond legislative repeal.
Mr. Carter and Mr. Groome offered substitutes for the
article stricken out, when
Mr. Nelson raised the point of order that the entire
article having been stricken out by the action of the Con-
vention, no report from the committee on usury was be-
fore the Convention, and therefore no substitutes were
in order.
224


 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings and Debates of the 1867 Constitutional Convention
Volume 74, Volume 1, Debates 224   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives