clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings and Debates of the 1867 Constitutional Convention
Volume 74, Volume 1, Debates 127   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space
speeches to which he had just listened. He did not un-
derstand that anybody wanted today a poll-tax. About
220 years ago the levying of taxes by poll was declared
to be grievous, and no poll-tax had been levied here since
1654. Poll-taxes never had been levied in the State of
Maryland, nor in the Province of Maryland for one hun-
dred years before she became a sovereign Stale. This
Convention might as well say that the good people of An-
napolis shall not eat their oysters shell and all. [Laugh-
ter. ] What good would it do? No one supposed they
would eat their oysters shell and all, but they might as
well be prohibited from doing it. You say paupers ought
not to be taxed. What difference did it make if you did
tax them? Could you collect it? [Laughter. ] Then
why put it in? There is no question here whether you
have a poll-tax or not; it is only whether you say poll-
taxes are grievous. He was for striking the clause out,
but was not to be responsible for any grievances that
might follow. It was a windmill which they were now
tilting at.
Mr. Stoddert said the gentleman from Allegany had
taken the correct position. This was not the time or the
place to discuss the wisdom, justice or expediency of a
poll-tax. The proper body to consider that question was
the Legislature. The people had the power to prevent the
tax if it is of the grievous character it has been described.
The discussion which has taken place was wrong and ill-
advised, and would have the tendency to array the poor
man against the rich man. Every State but Maryland and
this had abandoned the abstraction contained in Ohio
article. The property of the people of his county
(Charles) had depreciated immensely, and the taxation
was imposed on but a small proportion of them. They
had a population of 12, 000 negroes who, while enjoying
the benefits of the government, contributed nothing to
its support. As the gentleman from Baltimore (Mr.
Brown) had said, the landed interests had to bear the
burden. The people of his county were in favor of a poll-
tax, and while they did not wish to impose it on the other
counties, they desired the privilege of coming to the Leg-
islature to ask it for themselves.
Without coming to a vote on the amendment, the Con-
vention, at 2 P. M., adjourned.
127


 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings and Debates of the 1867 Constitutional Convention
Volume 74, Volume 1, Debates 127   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives