48 Journal of the State Council, 1784-1789.

	Claimants	against whom	Reasons why not passed
	Bennett Neale	Alexander Lawson & Co.	Apply to A. Lawson & Co. for pay- ment.
	William Smith Sec'y for		The Bond ought to be paid and
	Doctr. Stevenson to A.	Doctr. Henry Stevenson	taken up before the Claim is ad-
	Hoops		missible.
			Probate wanting by Geo. Fitzhugh,
	George Fitzhugh	Daniel Dulany of Walter	that he has received no Satisfac- tion from Daniel Dulany or in-
			demnification for the said Claim.
	Hambleton Davidson	Robert Christie Jun'r.	Wants explanation and information.
			No Probate that R Alexander re-
	Clement Sewell	Robert Alexander	ceived the money, Mr. Sewell only makes a Memorandum of his
			belief not upon Oath.
			This being a private Acco't. against
	George McCandless	Nottingham Company	Corbin Lee is inadmissible as a
			Claim against the Company.
	Shields & Mattison	Ditto	Same
			It appears by Mr. Chalmers's
	Clement Sewell Adm'r. of Mrs. Smith	James Chalmers	Books and other Vouchers, that there will be Nothing due the Estate of Mrs. Smith on a Settle-
			ment of their Accounts.
	[p 57]
			It appears by Mr. Chalmer's
			Books and other Vouchers, that
	Joseph Harris	James Chalmers	there will be nothing due Joseph
			Harris on a Settlement of their
			Accounts.
	Barbara Harris	Ditto	Same
	Thomas Riche	Ditto	Same
	Sylv's. Prothero ass'd. to R. Anderson	Ditto	Same
	John Moore	Ditto	Same
			By an Account current exhibited
			by Mr. Chalmers, it appears that
	George Haynes	Ditto	Mr. Haynes is indebted to him for rent after the Expiration of
			his lease.
		By Order	T. Johnson Jr. C[ler]k