| Volume 70, Page 414 View pdf image (33K) |
414 Provincial Court Proceedings, 1683.
Liber W. C. liberty to imparle hereunto untill the next Provinciall Court and
it is granted unto him, and the same day is given to the plt also:
Att wch said next Provinciall Court to wit the thirtyeth day of
June in the Eigth year of the Dominion of the Right honoble
Charles Lord Baltemore &c. Annoq Doni 1683 came the said
partyes by their Attorneys aforesaid and the said Thomas Sikes
by his said Attorney sayth, That he the said Edward Maddox did
not assume upon himself or to ye said Thomas sikes promise in
manner and forme as the said Thomas hath above declared against
him and of this he puts himself Upon the Country, And the Pit
likewise Itt is therefore comanded the sheriffe of st Maryes County
that he Cause to come here twelve &c. whome &c. and Who neither
&c. to recognize &c. because aswell &c.
On wch said thirtyeth day of June in the yeare aforesaid Came
the Said partyes by their Attorneys aforesaid and the Jurors Tm
pannelled being called likewise came, to wit, Phillip Lynes Richard
Keene, John Hungerford Richard Royston John Power Samuell
Dobson, John Wilkenson Thomas Stonestreet, James Phillips
Stephen Murty Dennis Hurley & Hugh Hopewell Who being elected
p. 732 tryed and sworne to say the truth in the premisses Upon their
Oathes doe say That the said Edward Maddox did assume upon
himself, and to the said Thomas Sikes promise in manner and
forme as the said Thomas hath above declared against him and
that the Said Edward hath not well & perfectly cured the said
Samuel Sikes according to his said promise and assumption, Wch
verdict of the Jurors aforesaid being read and heard the said Edward
Maddox by his Attorney aforesaid moved in arrest of Judgment
and thereupon day is given unto both partyes untill the Last day
of this Court.
Att wch day (to witt) the sixth day of June in the yeare afore
said Came the ptyes aforesaid by their Attorneys aforesaid and the
said Edward Maddox by his said Attorney offereth to the Court
here his reasons for arresting the Judgment aforesaid wch are as
folioweth Viz
First) The deft Maddox sayth that notwithstanding any thing
by the Jury above found Yett Judgment Ought not thereupon to
be given ffor that it plainely appeares that the said samuel Sikes
in the Declaration menconed did Languish with a disease Called
a Noli me Tanegere, disease is by all Phisitians accompted in
cureable & the Law will not oblige to imposibilityes, soe that to
assume or warrant to perfectly cure such a disease is voyd in
Lawe it being impossible It being a rule in Lawe that floe promise
will oblige unless it be, ffirst honest, Secondly Law full & thirdly
possible as in Dr & Student ffolio 102
(Secondly) The plt hath declared that in Consideracon the plt
would Lay the deft Two hundred & twenty foot of ffloores with
|
||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Volume 70, Page 414 View pdf image (33K) |
|
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.