| Volume 70, Page 406 View pdf image (33K) |
406 Provincial Court Proceedings, 1683.
Liber W. C. aforesaid And the aforesaid One Couch One Pestell and One paire
of potracks to be delivered as aforesd Then the Said Michael Miller
and James Ringold shall signe seale and as their Act and deed
deliver each to the other a Release acquittance and sufficient dis
charge of and for all and all manner of accons and suites Causes of
accons & suites Judgments executions bonds bills debts dues and
demands whatsoever, And also of and from all other variances
strifes Quarrells Controversies & debates whatsoever had made
stirred or depending between the said James Ringold and Michael
Miller from the beginning of the world untill the day of the date of
the above obligacon, and that the said partyes shall not delay the
doeing thereof longer then the ffive and twentyeth day of December
next
(Sixthly) Wee Doe Award Arbitrate Judge and determine that
the said James Ringold doe and shall pay unto William Cocks
Clerke for writeing this Award the sume of Two hundred pounds of
good sound Marchantable Leafe tobacco in Caske conveniently in
Kent County aforesaid at or upon the tenth day of October next,
As by the said writeing of Award Relation being thereunto had
more fully and more att large it doth and may appeare, And the
said James Ringold by protesting sayth that the aforesaid Michael
Miller hath not performed or fulfilled anything in the Award afore
said above Specifyed on his part to be fulfilled & pformed according
to the forme and effect of the said Awards, In fact the sd James
Sayth That the aforesaid Michael Miller did not pay or Cause to be
payd unto the sd James Ringold the aforesaid sume of Six thousand
six hundred eighty and six pounds of tobacco in the award afore
said abovespecifyed, Nor hath ye sd Michael delivered in kind to
the said James Ringold One Couch One pestell and one paire of
potracks according to the forme and Effect of the same writeing
of Award Whereupon he prayeth Judgment and his debt afore
said Together with his Damages by Occasion of the detaineing of
that debt to him to be Adjudged
And the said Michael protesting sayth That the award above in
the pits Replication sett forth and the matter therein contained is
not Sufficient Legally to charge the said Michael with the per
formance thereof ffor Plea sayth. That the said Award was not
Drawne up by the said One and thirtyeth day of the Month of May
in the Condition above specifyed Indented under the hands and
Seales of the said Arbitrators, Nor was the same in such time
delivered to the said Michael according to the Tenor of ye said
Condition Although he the said Michael required the same, And
this he is ready to averr Whereupon as before he prayes Judgment
If the said James his accon against him Oought to have
And the said James Ringold sayth that by anything above al
ledged hee of his accon aforesaid ought not to be barred because
|
||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Volume 70, Page 406 View pdf image (33K) |
|
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.